Other conditions decisions — 2003
5,367 indexed Board decisions in 2003.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The veteran's income for the period between December 1, 2001, and December 1, 2002, exceeded the annual income limitation of $12,516 for a veteran with one dependent. Therefore, he is not entitled to nonservice-connected pension benefits during this period.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2003
The Board has granted a 50 percent rating for the veteran's service-connected residuals of poliomyelitis, which includes weakness in the paraspinal muscles, intercostal muscles, and abdominal muscles.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized inpatient services at a non-VA hospital is denied as he does not meet the criteria set forth under VA regulations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The Board has ordered further development due to the need for additional evidence or clarification. The case is now being remanded back to the RO for further review and consideration.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The VA denied the veteran's claims for increased disability ratings for his service-connected peptic ulcer disease and rheumatic heart disease. The RO granted service connection for both conditions but did not assign a higher rating than the current 10 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The Board has ordered further development due to the need for additional evidence and clarification. The case is now remanded to the RO for specific actions.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2003
The Board has determined that there was no bad faith in the creation of the overpayment, and thus the appellant's claim for waiver of recovery is granted. The case will be reviewed again under the standard of equity and good conscience.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The Board denied the appellant's request to reopen his claim for VA compensation and/or pension benefits due to lack of new and material evidence, as the submitted documents were not significant enough to change the previous denial.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2003
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for a left arm and hand disorder based on new evidence submitted since the previous denial. The appeal is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The veteran's claim is being remanded for further evaluation due to conflicting evidence and the need for additional examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The Board has ordered a hearing before RO personnel to address the veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of venereal disease. The case will be returned to the RO after the hearing.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The Board denied the appellant's claim for accrued benefits, finding that it was not timely filed.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2003
The Board has determined that recovery of the overpayment would not be against equity and good conscience, thus denying the appellant's request for waiver.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2003
The Board has determined that the appellant was at fault in creating an overpayment of VA DIC benefits, and thus recovery would not be against equity and good conscience.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2003
The Board determined that the veteran's varicose veins in the left lower extremity is due to or the proximate result of his service-connected postoperative residuals of a left knee ligament repair, and granted secondary service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The Board determined that the veteran did not file a timely request for waiver of overpayment in the amount of $10,538.00 within 180 days from November 2000.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2003
The Board found that the veteran was solely at fault in creating the overpayment of $5,347.00 due to his failure to report his unearned income promptly. The decision grants waiver of recovery of this overpayment as it would not deprive the veteran of basic necessities and does not defeat the purpose of the benefit.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The case is being remanded for a Travel Board hearing due to the appellant's request. The issues of service connection and increased evaluation for migraine headaches are still pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The Board has remanded the case due to conflicting information on the appellant's service, requiring a new request from the service department for verification of his alleged period of service from 1942 to 1945.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The Board found that the appellant's net worth was excessive for receiving death pension benefits, including special monthly pension. The decision stated that her assets were sufficient to meet her living expenses.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.