Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
6,421 vetted Board decisions in 2004.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have manifestations of fatigue due to an undiagnosed illness and therefore, service connection for fatigue is denied.
The veteran's service-connected traumatic amputation of the left hand does not alone render him unemployable. The Board found that his nonservice-connected Parkinson's disease is the primary cause of his inability to work.
The Board found no evidence of a respiratory disorder or dizziness in service and denied the veteran's claims for service connection.
The Board has determined that the appellant's injuries were not incurred in line of duty and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
The Board denied the veteran's application to reopen his claim for basic eligibility for VA benefits due to a lack of new and material evidence, as the service department certified that he had no recognized service in the United States Armed Forces.
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including a VA examination to assess the current severity of the appellant's epigastric hernia and its impact on his employability. The claim will be reconsidered after this additional development.
The veteran seeks service connection for onchomycosis, which he claims was present during service but not treated due to other more serious issues. The RO denied the claim in April 2002 and remanded it for further development.
The Board determined that the appellant did not have sufficient military service to qualify for VA benefits and therefore denied eligibility.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for VA benefits as her spouse did not have verified active military service with the U.S. Armed Forces.
The Board found that the appellant had no recognized service for VA benefit purposes and denied his claim.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for stomach cancer due to exposure to ionizing radiation and for the cause of his death, finding that there was no evidence linking these conditions to his military service or any incident therein. The appellant is not entitled to accrued benefits.
The veteran's income, including his wife's income, exceeded the maximum allowable pension rate for a veteran with one dependent. As such, he was denied non-service-connected pension benefits.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for tuition assistance top-up benefits because his application was filed late, and he did not meet the one-year deadline before October 15, 2001.
The veteran's claim for educational benefits under the Veterans Education Assistance Program (Chapter 32) was denied due to a lack of confirmation of a payment made in September 1998. The case is being remanded for further investigation and consideration.
The Board found no evidence to support the veteran's claims of a heart attack and cardiovascular disorders during or as a result of his military service. The preponderance of medical evidence does not indicate these conditions were incurred in service.
The Board has denied the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for spondylosis, claimed as a bad back, finding no competent medical evidence linking his current disability to service.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for an earlier effective date for the grant of Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) benefits, finding that her September 1972 remarriage to W.P. reinstated her DIC benefits, which were subsequently terminated upon each subsequent divorce. The appellant filed a new application in August 2000 after J.C.'s death, but the RO did not assign an earlier effective date.
The Board found that the veteran's additional left knee disability was not incurred or aggravated by service, and is not proximately due to a service-connected disability.
The Board found that the veteran's service-connected seronegative spondyloarthropathy does not meet or approximate the criteria for a higher rating, as there is no evidence of constitutional symptoms, severe impairment of health, or incapacitating exacerbations occurring four or more times a year.
The Board has determined that the veteran's dysthymia is productive of definite social and industrial impairment, warranting a rating of 30 percent.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.