Other conditions decisions — 2005
7,072 indexed Board decisions in 2005.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2005
The Board has determined that the appellant's spouse did not have recognized active military service for purposes of eligibility for VA benefits, and thus denied her claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2005
The Board has remanded the case due to issues related to whether an overpayment of VA compensation benefits was properly created.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2005
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete service records and a need for further development, including obtaining medical opinions regarding whether the testicular cancer is related to trauma in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for bilateral varicose veins of the lower extremities and a right shoulder condition, finding that the evidence did not meet the criteria for higher disability ratings.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran's postoperative bilateral inguinal hernias do not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation, and his postoperative neuroma at the site of a previous right inguinal hernia repair does not warrant an evaluation in excess of 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2005
The VA denied service connection for blood in the urine, recurrent urinary tract infections, and a skin rash as they are not related to service or an undiagnosed illness.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2005
The veteran's claim for an increased rating for his bilateral chondromalacia is being remanded due to the need for a VA examination and further development of the record.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2005
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a psychiatric disability, finding that there is no competent medical evidence showing a diagnosis of a compensable psychiatric disorder during his active duty.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2005
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development and review of the claims file.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2005
The veteran has agreed to an apportionment of his VA nonservice-connected pension benefits to his spouse, and the Board finds no basis for a denial.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a liver disability, emphysema, traumatic posterior subcapsular cataract of the right eye, and dental condition (tooth #14), finding that his conditions were not incurred or aggravated by military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2005
The Board denied the appellant's claim for nonservice-connected death pension benefits due to her income exceeding the statutory limits, despite the veteran's service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2005
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and a need for further development, including obtaining VA assistance unit records from Marion, Illinois.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2005
The Board has determined that the reduction of the veteran's rating for hypertensive vascular disease from 60 percent to 10 percent, effective August 1, 2002, was proper based on improvement in blood pressure readings.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2005
The veteran requested to withdraw all appeals and issues with VA, including the appeal for a TDIU prior to October 16, 2003.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a thoracic spine condition, finding no evidence linking his current condition to his military service or any service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2005
The Board denied service connection for left eye injuries, finding no evidence of a current disability related to service. The right eye condition was found to be due to diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of sinus infection and chronic conjunctivitis of the right eye, finding no evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran's basal cell carcinoma did not originate in service and is denying the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2005
The Board denied the appellant's claim to reopen for eligibility to VA benefits because no new and material evidence was submitted.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.