Other conditions decisions — 2006
7,195 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board denied service connection for cataract of the right eye and denied an increased rating for traumatic cataract of the left eye. The veteran's right eye condition is not related to his service-connected left eye disability, and there is no evidence linking the right eye condition to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board found that the veteran did not have varicose veins during service and that his current condition is not related to service. Therefore, the claim for service connection was denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board denied service connection for a left hand disorder and denied eligibility for VA dental treatment due to lack of evidence within one year of separation from active duty.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board found that the veteran's service-connected lumbar spine disability did not warrant a higher rating under any of the criteria in effect during the appeal period, as his forward flexion was within normal limits and he had no unfavorable ankylosis. The veteran's neurologic symptoms were separately rated.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2006
The Board has determined that the evidence and information currently of record are sufficient to substantiate the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for bilateral patellofemoral syndrome. Therefore, no further development is required to comply with the notice or duty to assist provisions of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2006
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development and consideration of his claims, including a neurological examination to determine the nature and etiology of his diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2006
The veteran's right and left elbow ligament damage, diagnosed as epicondylitis and cubital tunnel syndrome, are currently rated at 10 percent each. The Board finds that the current evaluations adequately reflect the severity of her disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings and compensation evaluations for his service-connected bilateral pes planus, deviated nasal septum, and dental disorder. The veteran's deviated nasal septum was found to be manifested by a mildly deviated septum with 30-40% obstruction on one side, without any significant interference with employment or hospitalization.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board has determined that hyperlipidemia, a laboratory test result, does not constitute a disability for which service connection can be granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The VA has denied the veteran's claims for initial evaluations in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected nerve damage, left median nerve and nerve transection, femoral nerve, left lower extremity.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The veteran's service did not meet the required criteria for eligibility to receive nonservice-connected disability pension benefits due to a lack of active, wartime service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2006
The veteran seeks an effective date prior to May 22, 2003 for service connection of HIV/AIDS, HTLVIII, and dysphoric disorder. The case is being remanded due to the need to obtain records related to a VA examination scheduled in May 2003.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board has denied the appellant's claim for an apportionment of the veteran's compensation benefits due to the fact that the veteran is reasonably discharging his responsibility for the appellant's support, despite receiving more than $1550 per month in spousal support.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2006
The Board has granted service connection for epididymitis and testicular pain, finding that the veteran's condition is related to his active duty service. The claim for service connection for a right shoulder disorder was denied as new and material evidence had not been submitted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2006
The VA has determined that the appellant is not eligible for VA benefits due to lack of military service. The appeal is being returned to the RO for scheduling a personal hearing before a Veterans Law Judge at the RO.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2006
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine if the veteran's December 5, 2003 eye treatment was an emergency and whether VA facilities were accessible for his condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The VA determined that the veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected disability, and thus denied his claim for service connection for the cause of his death.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2006
The Board has granted service connection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus as a result of presumed exposure to herbicides during service in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2006
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination and incomplete medical records, requiring further development including a new VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2006
The Board found that chronic edema and swelling of the lower extremities were not incurred or aggravated by active military service or due to a service-connected disability.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.