Other conditions decisions — 2006
7,195 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2006
The veteran's appeal has been withdrawn, effectively dismissing the case.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2006
The veteran's request for waiver of an overpayment of $32,513.01 was not timely filed and therefore the claim is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2006
The Board found no evidence of a dysthymic disorder or peptic ulcer disease in service, and denied the veteran's claims for these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2006
The veteran's appeal was denied because he acknowledged that the property had not been inspected by VA or HUD during construction, and thus did not qualify for government assistance in correcting structural deficiencies.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2006
The Board has ordered further development of the claim, including obtaining SSA records and rating all nonservice-connected conditions. The case will be returned to the RO for these actions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2006
The case is being remanded for the veteran to be provided a videoconference hearing before a Veterans Law Judge.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations for his service-connected postoperative benign prostatic hypertrophy with urethral stricture, traveculated bladder, and uretheroplasty. The RO had previously granted a higher evaluation in February 2006.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected residuals of a right femur fracture with shortening of the leg, finding that the current 20 percent rating adequately reflects the severity of his disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2006
The veteran's claims for increased ratings for fifth and seventh cranial nerve injuries, as well as a scar of the right side of the face and limited motion of temporomandibular articulation, are denied. The veteran is currently rated at 10 percent for each issue.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2006
The Board's decision denying service connection for residuals of a herniated disc and neuritis is reversed due to clear and unmistakable error.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2006
The Board finds that the veteran's peripheral vascular disease of the lower extremities and generalized atherosclerotic disease are secondary to his nicotine dependence acquired in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's claim to reopen his service connection for spastic duodenitis was not supported by new and material evidence, resulting in a denial of the request.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2006
The Board is remanding the case for additional development, including obtaining VA and service department treatment records, to determine if the veteran's pulmonary fibrosis was related to his exposure to herbicide agents during service in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2006
The Board has granted a 60 percent evaluation for the veteran's colon condition, effective from the date of service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's current back disorder did not begin during service and is not related to any incident of service, thus denying his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2006
The Board found no residuals of an injury to the sternocleidomastoid muscle and denied service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran is entitled to an effective date of May 8, 1997 for SMC under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1114(r)(1) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.350(h), based on his entitlement to aid and attendance due to his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings and earlier effective dates for his service-connected prostate condition and hiatal hernia, finding that the evidence did not support a grant of these benefits prior to the specified dates.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2006
The Board has remanded the case to the RO for additional development, including obtaining an addendum to a VA examination report and securing medical records from the Baltimore VAMC.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2006
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including notification of the Veteran's Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA).
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.