Other conditions decisions — 2006
7,195 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2006
The VA determined that the veteran's right gluteus muscle numbness does not warrant a compensable evaluation, as it is only a slight disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has remanded the case for a VA examination to determine if the veteran currently has metatarsalgia and whether it is related to service. The claim will be reviewed again after this additional development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has remanded the veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for adenocarcinoma of the prostate due to procedural deficiencies.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The RO has denied the reopening of a previously denied claim for service connection due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's partial colectomy and partial iliectomy with iliosigmoidoscopy currently cause no more than moderate digestive symptoms, and therefore does not meet the criteria for an increased evaluation.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the appellant's claim for service connection for residuals of injuries to head, body, and legs was denied because no new and material evidence was received. The RO previously denied this claim in December 1958, which is now final.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board denied the appellant's claim for basic eligibility to VA benefits due to a lack of valid military service in the U.S. Armed Forces during World War II.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board found that the veteran's keratoconus was not incurred in or aggravated during active service and is not proximately due to his service-connected Grave's disease. As a result, the claim for service connection for keratoconus was denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for a VA examination to determine his competency for VA purposes.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has determined that the appellant's deceased husband did not have recognized service to make her eligible for VA benefits, and this case is being remanded due to procedural issues.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been received to reopen the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for an arthritic left hip.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board found that the veteran's testicular atrophy was not incurred in or aggravated by service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2006
The VA determined that the veteran's lichen simplex chronicus warranted an initial disability rating of 10 percent, effective April 1, 2003.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the veteran's cocaine addiction is related to his service, specifically a single administration of cocaine for a nasal fracture repair in September 1987. The claim will be further developed and reviewed.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the cause of the veteran's death, acute respiratory failure secondary to aspiration pneumonia, is not related to his service-connected condition (rheumatic heart disease). The preponderance of evidence does not support a finding that the veteran's cause of death was incurred or aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The veteran's daughter did not file a claim for accrued benefits within one year of her father's death, and thus is not entitled to such benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board denied the appellant's claim for basic eligibility for VA benefits due to a lack of verified service in the United States Armed Forces.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2006
The appeal is dismissed as the appellant died during the pendency of the appeal and the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has found that the appellant had no recognized service and is not eligible for VA benefits. The appeal is being remanded due to issues with notice requirements.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to procedural matters, including scheduling a hearing and providing VCAA notice.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.