Other conditions decisions — 2006
7,195 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board found that the veteran does not have dementia due to head trauma related to service and denied the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for postoperative left hallux valgus with hammertoe deformities, finding that there is no evidence of such a condition during or within one year after service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have residuals of a right foot injury incurred or aggravated by service, and his current right shoulder disability is not shown to warrant an evaluation in excess of 10 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has ordered the VA to obtain medical records from Providence Hospital and request authorization for these records. A supplemental opinion is also needed regarding whether metal fragments in the veteran's face caused or contributed to his death, including by causing mouth cancer.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2006
The veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to his death, and the Board does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a dental disability and eligibility for VA outpatient dental treatment, finding no evidence of in-service trauma or compensable condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board found that the veteran's surgery did not cause disability and denied his claim for VA compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has denied the appellant's claim for recognition as a 'child' of the veteran based on permanent incapacity for self-support prior to attaining the age of eighteen. The evidence does not support the appellant's assertion that he was incapable of self-support at age eighteen.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board found that the veteran's current skin condition is not related to his military service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The evidence does not support a conclusion that the veteran has experienced one major seizure in the last six months or two in the last year, nor an average of five to eight minor seizures per week. Therefore, her claim for an increased rating for convulsive disorder is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination, and the RO must conduct a new VA examination to determine the current severity of the veteran's service-connected right knee disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The VA has determined that the veteran's right ear hearing loss does not warrant a rating higher than 10 percent, as it is currently rated. The evidence did not show an increase in disability since his initial rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The veteran's peptic disease is rated at 10 percent, and his chronic low back pain and strain are rated at 40 percent. The Board found that the symptoms of peptic disease do not warrant a higher rating under Diagnostic Code 7305, as they do not more nearly approximate the criteria for a higher rating to 20 percent (or 40 percent or 60 percent). The veteran's low back disability is rated based on sciatic nerve paralysis. No new evidence was presented to reopen his service connection claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board denied an earlier effective date for the grant of a 20 percent rating for Bell's palsy and denied an increased rating for dermatophytosis. The veteran is not entitled to an earlier effective date prior to April 6, 1998, for the grant of service connection and the assignment of a 20 percent rating for Bell's palsy.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The veteran is seeking benefits under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for additional disability resulting from a right L3-L4 hemilaminectomy performed at a VA hospital in September 1984. The case has been remanded due to missing medical records and incomplete examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The VA denied a claim for an increased evaluation for the veteran's service-connected right knee disability, finding that the evidence did not support a rating in excess of 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's perforated left tympanic membrane, or residuals thereof, is not related to his military service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The veteran's terminal squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue is not service-connected, and there is no evidence that it was caused by herbicide exposure. The appellant's claim for DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 is denied as the veteran was not receiving compensation at the time of his death.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The VA determined that the veteran's postoperative residuals of a right acromioclavicular separation do not warrant an evaluation in excess of 30 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the submitted evidence is not new and material, thus denying the reopening of the claim for service connection for a respiratory disorder.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.