Other conditions decisions — 2006
7,195 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claim for VA outpatient dental treatment due to a lack of evidence showing that his loss of teeth numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 16, 21, and 32 was due to service trauma or other conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The veteran's claim for service connection for herpes zoster was denied. His varicose veins of both legs are currently rated at 40% each, but he is not entitled to higher initial ratings.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2006
The Board has remanded the case for further development and consideration of the veteran's claim for nonservice-connected pension benefits, including a clear accounting and computation of annualized income and expenses during the appellate period.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board found no evidence of a current disability for which service connection could be awarded, and denied the veteran's claims for service connection for fatigue and gastrointestinal disorder due to an undiagnosed illness.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board found that the veteran's cause of death, terminal metastatic cancer/brain cancer, was not related to his service or any service-connected disability. The claim for service connection for the cause of death is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a hip disorder, including as secondary to a service-connected left knee disability due to lack of medical evidence linking the hip disorder to the service-connected left knee disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's residuals of a fracture of the right little finger do not warrant a rating in excess of 10 percent.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2006
The veteran's diminished intellectual functioning, secondary to cerebral arteriovenous malformations, is currently evaluated as 50 percent disabling. The Board finds that the symptoms do not warrant a higher evaluation.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · February 2006
The veteran's throat cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, was not incurred as a result of service and may not be presumed to have been so incurred.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's fracture of the left fifth metatarsal is no more than moderately disabling and does not warrant a rating in excess of 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The VA denied the veteran's claim for a higher disability rating for his cervical spine disorder, hemangioma of C7 vertebra. The condition is currently rated at 30 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board denied an initial compensable disability rating for a scalp laceration, finding that the evidence did not support a compensable evaluation under either the previous or amended versions of the skin disorders rating criteria.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2006
The Board has ordered the case to be remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and providing the veteran with notice of his options for testifying before the Board.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board found that the evidence received was not new and material, thus denying the reopening of the claim for service connection for a back injury.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's peripheral vascular disease is not related to his military service and denied his claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2006
The veteran's request for a personal hearing at the RO before a Veterans Law Judge (VLJ) has been noted. The case is REMANDED to the RO for scheduling this hearing and returning it to the Board after the hearing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2006
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the nature and etiology of the veteran's genitourinary disability, including whether it is related to service or preexisted service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2006
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development of the record, including obtaining medical records and conducting a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's left leg disability, including thigh and hip, was not incurred or aggravated during active duty service. The claim for dental disability is also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2006
The veteran's claim for educational benefits under Chapter 30, Title 38 was denied because she did not meet the service requirements for basic eligibility due to her discharge or release from active duty for convenience of the government.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.