Other conditions decisions — 2006
7,195 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's corpus of estate is excessive for receiving VA improved pension benefits, and thus denied his claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board denied the appellant's claim for VA death benefits as her deceased husband did not have verified active military service with the U.S. Armed Forces.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board has found no current diagnosis of malaria or treatment for it, and thus denied the veteran's claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for duodenal ulcer disease, psychoneurosis, and a fungus infection of the feet and hands as there is no evidence to support higher evaluations under VA rating criteria.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board has determined that the evidence received since the January 1997 decision is not new and material, and thus does not meet the requirements to reopen the claim for recognition as a POW for VA purposes.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board found that the veteran's fatal heart disease was not caused by or related to his service-connected disabilities, and thus denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2006
The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for his service-connected compression fracture of L1, with fusion from T10 through L4 is being remanded due to the need for a further VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected traumatic arthritis, status post right knee injury, currently evaluated as 10 percent disabling.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board denied the appellant's claim for VA death benefits based on her deceased spouse's service, finding no recognized service in the U.S. Armed Forces.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2006
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a Board hearing at the RO.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2006
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection and granted that claim on the merits, finding a psychosis was incurred in active service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2006
The Board has remanded the case for further development and adjudication, including consideration of a claim of clear and unmistakable error (CUE) by the RO in December 1997 regarding service connection for emphysema and nicotine dependence.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a diagnosed stomach disorder and therefore, service connection for such a disorder is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for initial noncompensable evaluations for numbness of the arms, swelling, and diarrhea as due to undiagnosed illnesses. The disabilities were found not to meet the criteria for a compensable rating under applicable diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2006
The Board has determined that the appellant has basic eligibility for an apportionment of the veteran's VA benefits, and thus the appeal is granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2006
The Board has granted a 60 percent rating for the veteran's service-connected duodenal ulcer, post gastrectomy syndrome, which is currently rated at 40 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board denied the appellant's claim for VA benefits due to a lack of service in the United States Armed Forces in the Philippines.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for an increased disability rating for service-connected impotence associated with status post prostatectomy secondary to prostate cancer, finding that there is no evidence of penile deformity and thus a noncompensable rating is appropriate.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a currently diagnosed left arm disorder for which service connection may be granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2006
The Board is remanding the case for additional development to ensure compliance with the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 and other relevant regulations.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.