Other conditions decisions — 2006
7,195 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2006
The veteran's service records show multiple nasal issues, including a septal dislocation and fractures. The VA is instructed to attempt to obtain medical evidence from an otolaryngologist and provide the veteran with a VA examination to determine if his current nasal condition is related to service.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's osteochondromatosis of the right knee is properly rated under Diagnostic Code 5260, resulting in a maximum rating of 30 percent. The veteran was granted an increased rating to 30 percent for his right knee osteochondromatosis.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for vascular disease and venous insufficiency, which were secondary to his radical prostate surgery used to treat his service-connected adenocarcinoma of the prostate. The VA examiners found no medical evidence that these disabilities were related to or aggravated by the prostate surgery.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2006
The Board has determined that the overpayment of VA educational benefits in the amount of $24,529.40 was improperly created and has ordered a remand for further action.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2006
The Board has determined that the overpayment of VA educational benefits in the amount of $22,501.67 was improperly created and has ordered a remand for further action.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for his service-connected chondromalacia patella of the left knee, currently rated at 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2006
The Board found that the veteran's polio residuals did not incur in or aggravate by active military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2006
The Board has remanded the case for additional development to verify the appellant's service and assess whether her schizoaffective disorder is related to military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2006
The Board found that the veteran's pre-existing sleepwalking disorder did not undergo a permanent increase during his brief period of active duty and was instead a temporary flare-up. The evidence does not support an aggravation claim, as there is no clear indication of an in-service increase in severity.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for an increased rating for residuals of a fracture of the metacarpophalangeal joint, 4th and 5th digits, right hand and for service connection for posterior spondylosis at C5-6. The claim for an increased rating was denied as there is no evidence of any limitation of motion or functional impairment. The claim for service connection was denied as the veteran's condition did not meet the criteria for presumptive service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's genitourinary disorder, claimed as prostatitis, epididymitis, and/or vesiculitis, was not incurred in or aggravated by active service.,However, the veteran's bilateral hydroceles and bilateral epididymal cysts were incurred in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's avascular necrosis of the left femur is not attributable to any injury or disease during active military service and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have removal of both ovaries, and therefore is not entitled to a compensable rating for her right salpingo-oophorectomy.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's claim for a special home adaptation grant is denied as he is not entitled to such assistance due to his eligibility for specially adapted housing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2006
The veteran's claim for an increased rating of his service-connected right anterior tibial disability is being remanded due to the need for a more contemporaneous VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's residuals of a gunshot wound of the abdomen with postoperative colostomy do not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation, and thus denied his claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2006
The veteran's duodenal ulcer is currently rated at 20 percent, and the Board finds that it does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2006
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the veteran's claim for service connection of left brachial plexopathy, which is linked to an injury sustained during active duty for training in August 1988.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2006
The Board found no verified stressors and denied service connection for PTSD.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2006
The veteran's appeal for a compensable disability evaluation for post-operative right inguinal hernia has been dismissed as he withdrew his appeal prior to the Board making a decision.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.