Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
7,634 vetted Board decisions in 2007.
The veteran is granted a 30 percent disability evaluation for the period from September 30, 1999 to March 14, 2002. For the period from March 15, 2002 to the present, he is not entitled to a higher rating.
The Board has remanded the case to ensure that there is a complete record upon which to decide whether new and material evidence has been presented to reopen the veteran's claim for service connection of his right leg disability.
The Board has determined that the veteran's neck injury and gastrointestinal disorder are not related to his military service, leading to a denial of these claims.
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected left frontal neuralgia warrants an initial rating of 10 percent, as it is manifested by moderately severe tenderness and some numbness to pinprick sensation on the lateral aspect of the upper left forehead area.
The Board has determined that new and material evidence was received to reopen the veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a left bicep contusion. The Board also found that there is sufficient medical evidence linking the veteran's current condition to his military service, granting service connection.
The Board found that the veteran's overpayment of VA educational assistance benefits was valid and denied his appeal.
The Board has dismissed the appeal as service connection for dental trauma residuals to include loss of tooth number 8 is currently in effect, and no allegation of error remains.
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA examination and additional development of evidence.
The Board found no evidence of a psychiatric disability during service and denied the veteran's claim for service connection.
The Board found that the veteran did not have current residuals of a broken left tibia or avascular necrosis of the bilateral hip and femur bones that were incurred in service. The claims for service connection were denied.
The veteran's cerebrovascular accidents were not found to be related to his service-connected residuals of fractures of the right orbit and nasal bones, and he is denied an increased rating for those residuals.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for malaria and an initial disability rating in excess of 10 percent for residuals of a gunshot wound to the left knee. The veteran's claim for malaria was denied due to lack of evidence of current disability, while his claim for the gunshot wound was granted with a 10 percent evaluation.
The veteran's service-connected adjustment disorder was evaluated as 30 percent disabling prior to November 1, 2005. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating.
The Board has determined that the evidence received since the November 1971 rating decision is not new and material, thus denying the veteran's application to reopen his claim of service connection for left thumb disability.
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining missing service records and a VA examination to determine if the veteran's mood disorder is related to his military service.
The veteran's lung and respiratory disorder, claimed as lung tissue damage, and skin condition are being remanded for further examination to determine their etiology.
The Board has decided that the veteran's service connection claim for poliomyelitis should be remanded due to insufficient evidence and a need for further examination.
The Board finds that the veteran's service-connected tendonitis of the left foot is currently manifested by chronic Achilles tendonitis without limitation of motion, and thus does not meet the criteria for an initial disability rating in excess of 10 percent.
The Board has ordered additional efforts to obtain the appellant's personnel records, including his original DD Form 214 and other records regarding the facts and circumstances surrounding his OTH discharge. The case will be readjudicated after these records are obtained.
The veteran's appeal is denied as he does not meet the legal requirements for basic eligibility for VA educational assistance under Chapter 30.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.