Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
7,634 vetted Board decisions in 2007.
The case is being remanded to the RO for further proceedings consistent with a Court order. The appellant's husband served in units of the Philippine Army, and additional verification of his service is needed.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected gastric ulcer with vagotomy and antrectomy, as well as a separate compensable rating for tender scar of the abdomen. The veteran was not granted any additional ratings.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a service-connected compensable dental disability for which compensation may be granted, and thus denied his claim.
The Board found that the veteran's left varicocele is not related to his military service and denied both claims.
The Board found that the veteran's bilateral eye disability was not incurred in or aggravated by his active service and denied his claim.
The Board has determined that the veteran's death was not caused by his military service and denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.
The veteran's claim for a higher rating for his L-1 vertebra fracture was granted, and he is now rated at 50 percent. The service connection claims for PTSD, hepatitis C, and TDIU are pending, but the new evidence received to reopen his hepatitis C claim has been found sufficient.
The Board has granted service connection for Reiter's syndrome, finding that the condition is related to military service.
The veteran's claim for a higher evaluation for his service-connected right hand disability is granted, with the assigned rating of 20 percent. The claim for an increased evaluation for his service-connected right elbow disability remains denied.
The Board has ordered the case to be remanded for further development, including obtaining medical records and verifying an in-service injury.
The Board has determined that the veteran's cause of death was not caused by a service-connected disability, as there is no evidence linking his squamous cell carcinoma to active duty or any other condition for which he may have received service connection.
The Board found that there is no competent medical evidence showing a current lung disorder, including COPD, was incurred in or related to the veteran's military service. The veteran's dermatitis of the feet, pubic area and external auditory canals has been rated as 30% disabling under Diagnostic Code 7806 (eczema) since 1995.
The Board has determined that the appellant does not have a current bilateral hearing impairment as defined by VA regulation and there is no competent medical evidence showing a relationship between his ACDUTRA period and his claimed bilateral hearing loss. Therefore, service connection for bilateral hearing loss is denied.
The Board found that the veteran's prostate cancer is not related to his active service, including his exposure to ionizing radiation. The claim for service connection was denied.
The veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the claim for service connection for basal cell carcinoma before a decision was made by the Board.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection as there is no medical evidence linking his postoperative residuals for tumors of the parotid glands to his military service.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current lung disability and denied service connection for this condition. The issue of bilateral trench foot is addressed in the REMAND portion of the decision.
The appellant wishes to withdraw her appeal regarding whether new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen a service connection claim for cause of the veteran's death.
The VA determined that the veteran's right eye condition, resulting from a past injury during service, does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating due to his visual acuity and lack of significant functional impairment.
The Board finds that the appellant's Substantive Appeal was timely filed, allowing her appeal to proceed for the issue of entitlement to DIC under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.