Other conditions decisions — 2007
7,634 indexed Board decisions in 2007.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim for service connection due to aggravation of ADHD. However, it is denied as ADHD is a developmental disorder not subject to service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2007
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for residuals of burn, dorsal surface, right foot due to new and material evidence. However, the preponderance of the evidence is against a finding that the veteran's current right lower extremity problems are related to his in-service burn.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2007
The veteran's spondylolysis, L5, with mechanical lower back pain was rated at 10 percent prior to December 16, 2004. From December 16, 2004, the rating was increased to 20 percent.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2007
The Board has granted the veteran's application to reopen his claim for service connection for a chronic skin disorder, but further development is needed to address whether there is a nexus between any inservice dermatological symptoms and the current disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2007
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for a Travel Board hearing at the RO in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The case will be returned to the AMC after the hearing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2007
The Board has decided to remand the case for further development due to incomplete records and a need to provide proper VCAA notice.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2007
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to unresolved issues regarding service connection and DIC under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is denied as there is no current disability associated with a broken needle in the lower back that can be linked to VA treatment from the late 1940s.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2007
The VA has granted service connection for Reiter's Syndrome and assigned an initial, noncompensable rating. However, the veteran contends that his condition has worsened since the grant of service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's claimed impairment of vision was not incurred or aggravated by service, and thus denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for an increased disability rating for his service-connected right chest wall injury and denied service connection for a respiratory disability, including COPD.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board found no evidence linking the veteran's appendicitis residuals to his period of service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2007
The veteran's claim for a higher initial evaluation for his service-connected phobia is being remanded due to the need for further examination and current treatment records.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2007
The appeal has been dismissed due to the death of the appellant.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board denied the appellant's request to reopen her claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death, finding that no new and material evidence had been presented.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's death was caused by his exposure to aflatoxin in service, which led to his fatal hepatocellular carcinoma. As such, the cause of death is now considered service-connected.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a respiratory condition related to asbestos exposure during service and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board denied a request for an earlier effective date than April 16, 2001, for service connection of a right hip arthroplasty.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2007
The veteran's appeal for an earlier effective date for the grant of TDIU was dismissed because he did not file a timely notice of disagreement regarding the effective date within one year after being notified of the June 1994 rating decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board found that the veteran's condition did not meet the criteria for special monthly compensation due to loss of use of one foot, and this decision is being denied.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.