Other conditions decisions — 2007
7,634 indexed Board decisions in 2007.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board found no evidence of a current disability related to service, and the veteran's claim for service connection for vertebral basilar insufficiency was denied.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2007
The veteran withdrew their appeal before the Board could make a decision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2007
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further evaluation due to his employment impact and potential need for an extra-schedular rating. The case will be returned to the RO via the Appeals Management Center (AMC).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2007
The Board has remanded the case due to the veteran's request for a videoconference hearing, and the claim will be handled in an expeditious manner.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2007
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the failure to notify him of his scheduled Travel Board hearing, and he did not appear for it. The case will be rescheduled at the next available opportunity with proper notification sent at least 30 days prior.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board has confirmed and continued a longstanding 10 percent evaluation for post-traumatic arthritis of the right temporal mandibular joint, as this aspect is separately based upon objectively measured range of motion of the mandible. No increase in evaluation is warranted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2007
The veteran is seeking service connection for a lung disability that he claims was caused by a pulmonary embolus. The case has been remanded to obtain additional medical records and conduct further examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board denied payment or reimbursement for medical services received at Tampa General Hospital from February 23, 2002 to March 9, 2002 due to the veteran's condition stabilizing by that date and VA facilities being feasibly available.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2007
The veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death during the pendency of the appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The veteran is not blind in the left eye and therefore does not meet the legal requirement for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1160.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for multiple myeloma, finding no evidence of radiation exposure during service and insufficient medical opinion linking his current condition to military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2007
The Board has remanded the case for additional development and to provide proper VCAA notice.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2007
The Board granted a 30 percent evaluation for the veteran's healed fracture of the right radius, which was previously rated as 10 percent. The other issues related to shrapnel wounds to the right lower extremity were also addressed and are not included in this summary.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claim of service connection for a dental disability claimed as damage and disfigurement of the jaw secondary to dental treatment in service, finding that there was no current disability warranting service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current hearing disability for VA purposes, and thus cannot establish service connection for bilateral defective hearing.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board has determined that there is no evidence to support a finding of service connection for numbness in the veteran's right and left arms.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The veteran's service is not considered to be during a recognized period of war, thus denying his claim for nonservice-connected disability pension benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The Board has determined that the appellant's discharge from service was for willful and persistent misconduct, which bars him from receiving VA benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The VA determined that the veteran's service-connected post-operative residuals of basal cell carcinoma do not warrant a rating in excess of 30 percent.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's current right foot disability, including calcific achilles tendonitis of the right foot, narrowing of the subtalar joint of the right foot and calcification of the peroneal tendons of the right foot, is related to his military service.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.