Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
7,634 vetted Board decisions in 2007.
The veteran seeks an increased rating for his service-connected Crohn's Disease. The RO denied the claim in December 2002, and the Board has now remanded the case due to a lack of recent VA examination.
The veteran's claim for non-service-connected disability pension benefits is being remanded due to the need for further verification of his military service.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for polycythemia vera and a skin disorder, finding no new and material evidence to reopen the latter claim.
The Board has determined that there is no evidence of current shin splints, recurrent UTIs, or migraine headaches related to service. The appellant's claims for these conditions are therefore denied.
The Board has determined that the veteran's aqueductal stenosis with mild hydrocephalus is related to his military service, and therefore grants service connection for this condition.
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate evidence, and a VA examination is needed to determine if the veteran's current foot disabilities are related to his active military service.
The Board has ordered the RO to obtain medical records from the veteran's period of Army Reserve duty at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. The case will be returned for further review after these records are obtained.
The Board has remanded the case due to issues related to reopening a claim for nonservice-connected death pension benefits, and additional development is needed.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for multiple lipomas and chronic prostatitis, finding that there was no evidence of direct causation or a positive association with exposure to herbicides in Vietnam.
The Board found no clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in the November 2001 rating decision that assigned an effective date of September 27, 1999 for service connection for left anterior thigh muscle impairment.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for basic eligibility for VA benefits due to a lack of recognized service in the United States Armed Forces.
The Board has remanded the case due to scheduling issues and requests for additional evidence, including treatment records.
The veteran's death was not caused by or substantially contributed to by a disability incurred in service. The appellant is not eligible for nonservice-connected death pension benefits due to her deceased spouse's service as a Philippine Scout.
The Board has determined that the veteran's defective visual acuity, which includes myopia and cataracts, was not incurred in or aggravated by active military service.
The veteran's claim for VA educational assistance under Chapter 30 was denied because she did not meet the basic eligibility requirements, including serving at least three years of continuous active duty.
The veteran's service does not meet the threshold requirements for eligibility for VA pension benefits due to lack of wartime service.
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected neurological impairment of the right upper extremity, manifested by symptoms equivalent to no more than severe incomplete paralysis of the ulnar nerve, warrants a 40 percent evaluation and not higher.
The veteran seeks reimbursement for medical expenses incurred on August 3, 2004 at a non-VA hospital. The case is being remanded to obtain necessary records and determine the appropriate governing regulation.
The Board found that the veteran's small cell carcinoma of the lung and recurrent pneumonia were not service-connected, and did not find that his service-connected conditions contributed to his death.
The Board found that the cause of death, alcoholic liver disease and gastritis/peptic ulcer disease, was not related to service due to alcohol abuse.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.