Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
7,634 vetted Board decisions in 2007.
The Board has determined that the appellant's claims for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death, DIC under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318, and Dependent's Educational Assistance under Chapter 35 have been denied due to lack of new and material evidence.
The veteran's decreased visual acuity is due to refractive error and not related to service. The claim for service connection for decreased visual acuity is granted.
The Board found that the veteran's cause of death was not service-connected due to lack of evidence showing a primary cancer site in his lungs, and thus denied the claim for service connection for the cause of death. The other issues were also denied.
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral foot calluses due to new evidence presented since the previous denial. The case is now remanded for further examination and adjudication.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for scheduling a personal hearing via videoconference at the local office.
The Board found no evidence of loss of use of both feet and denied the veteran's claims for service connection and adaptive equipment.
The veteran's cancer of the left pharyngeal tonsil was not shown to be related to his military service, including exposure to herbicides. The Board found that there is no evidence linking the condition to service or any presumptive conditions associated with Agent Orange exposure.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for nonservice-connected death pension benefits due to a lack of entitlement under the law, as she did not have verified wartime service during her periods of active duty.
The veteran's claim for service connection for a chronic respiratory disorder is being remanded due to the need for additional evidence and an examination.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations for pleural effusion and diverticulosis, finding that neither condition warranted a rating in excess of the currently assigned 10 percent evaluations.
The veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 due to a perforation of the duodenum at a VA medical facility in March 2006 is being remanded for additional development.
The Board has determined that the appellant was not permanently incapable of self-support prior to her 18th birthday, and therefore does not meet the criteria for recognition as a helpless child of a veteran.
The Board found that the veteran's post-operative right tibial tubercle, Osgood-Schlatter's disease has been manifested primarily by impairment of the tibia and fibula reflecting moderate knee disability. The criteria for a higher rating were not met.
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a right eye disorder as secondary to his service-connected migraine headaches, finding no competent medical evidence of such a condition.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including scheduling a Travel Board hearing and ensuring compliance with VCAA notice requirements.
The Board found no evidence of a chronic back disability in service and concluded that the current back disability is not related to any inservice injury. As such, the claim for service connection for residuals of a back injury was denied.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including a VA examination and medical opinions regarding his service-connected conditions.
The Board has determined that the veteran's currently diagnosed bilateral knee condition was not incurred in service and denied his claim for service connection.
The veteran does not meet the basic eligibility requirements for nonservice-connected disability pension benefits due to a lack of qualifying wartime service.
The VA denied compensation for the residuals of oral maxillofacial surgery, finding no fault on VA's part in causing these conditions.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.