Other conditions decisions — 2008
8,453 indexed Board decisions in 2008.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The veteran's request for a waiver of recovery of an overpayment of VA pension benefits was denied as not timely filed.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2008
The Board granted an initial rating of 30 percent for cognitive disorder with verbal and visual memory deficits, resolving reasonable doubt in the veteran's favor.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The Board found that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2008
The appeal was dismissed due to the veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2008
The appeal of service connection for glioblastoma multiforme to include as due to exposure to Agent Orange was dismissed due to the veteran's death.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedMay 2008
The veteran's chronic restrictive airway disease with retained foreign body was rated as 20 percent disabling before January 22, 2003, and increased to 30 percent from that date.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The veteran's request for waiver of the recovery of overpayment of VA educational assistance benefits was denied due to bad faith on his part.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The veteran's service-connected prepyloric ulcer has healed, and his symptoms do not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The Board denied the veteran's claims for initial compensable disability evaluations for superficial retained shell fragments involving the skull and area around the eyes, as there was no evidence of scarring or limitation of function.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2008
The veteran's claim for an increased rating in excess of 40 percent for herniated nucleus pulposus at L5-S1 was remanded to provide the veteran with a new VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The Board denied the veteran's claim for additional nonservice-connected disability pension benefits for his two children, C. and A., as there was no evidence that they were members of the veteran's household or that he reasonably contributed to their support during the relevant time periods.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2008
The appeal is remanded for a VA examination to determine if the veteran's hiatal hernia is secondary to his service-connected duodenal ulcer.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2008
The claim for an increased rating is remanded to provide the veteran with a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The character of the veteran's discharge for his service from September 1, 1969, to February 8, 1971, is a bar to VA benefits based on that period of service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The Board denied service connection for residuals of a head injury and a fractured nose as there was no competent evidence showing the veteran currently suffers from these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The veteran's right lower leg disability results in no more than a slight ankle disability; a greater than 2 inch shortening of the right leg has not been shown.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2008
The veteran's claim for a disability evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his shell fragment wound (SFW) of the left calf, with postoperative compartment syndrome was remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The claims for benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1805 and § 1815 were denied as there was no competent evidence that the appellant has spina bifida or that her mother served in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2008
The appellant's claims for benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1805 and 38 U.S.C.A. § 1815 were denied because he is not a child of a Vietnam veteran and does not have standing to file such claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2008
The appeal is remanded to the RO for further development and adjudication of the issues on appeal.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.