Other conditions decisions — 2008
8,453 indexed Board decisions in 2008.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2008
The appellant was denied eligibility for VA healthcare without a co-payment requirement beginning October 10, 2003 due to exceeding the income threshold.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2008
The Board denied the claim for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 as a matter of law, due to the fact that the nursing home care provided at Delmar Gardens on the Green was not furnished by a VA employee or in a Department facility over which the Secretary has direct jurisdiction.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2008
The appeal was dismissed due to a Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) Order vacating the Board's August 2006 decision on the grounds that it no longer has jurisdiction to review the motion.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2008
The veteran, who is over the age of 65 and has a combined evaluation of 60 percent for pension purposes, is granted special monthly pension at the housebound rate.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2008
The Board remands the claims for further development, including obtaining additional medical records and scheduling a VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2008
The Board granted service connection for progressive proliferative glomerulonephritis, resolving all reasonable doubt in favor of the veteran.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2008
The appeal is remanded for additional development, including a VA examination to determine the current status of the veteran's service-connected right hand disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2008
The veteran was denied vocational rehabilitation training because there was no evidence of a serious employment handicap, and his current level of skills and training did not indicate the need for such training.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2008
The Board denied service connection for residuals of a head injury, finding that the veteran did not have any current residuals other than service-connected post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2008
The Board found that there was no evidence of additional disability as a result of the veteran's falls while in VA care, and thus denied the claim for benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2008
The Board remands the case for additional development, including providing VCAA notice and obtaining a medical opinion regarding the relationship between the veteran's service-connected disabilities and his death.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2008
The veteran's service-connected peptic ulcer disease, postoperative gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma was granted a 60 percent rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2008
The Board denied service connection for right upper quadrant pain with gallbladder wall thickening as there was no evidence of a nexus between the current disability and the veteran's in-service complaints.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2008
The appeal is remanded for further development, including an orthopedic examination to determine the nature and etiology of any right hand disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2008
The appeal is remanded to the RO for additional development and adjudication of related claims.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedMarch 2008
The veteran's neurogenic bowel was rated at 30 percent from September 21, 2001, through April 10, 2006, and increased to 60 percent starting on April 11, 2006.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2008
The veteran's claims for increased ratings for residuals of right inguinal hernia, herniated disc L5-S1, and Morton's interdigital neuritis were denied as the evidence did not support a higher rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2008
The Board found that the veteran's death was not proximately caused by carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of VA fault, nor was it the result of an event that was not reasonably foreseeable.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2008
The Board remands the case for proper VCAA notice as required by Vasquez and Dingess.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2008
The veteran's claim for nonservice-connected burial benefits was denied as he did not meet the eligibility requirements.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.