Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
7,663 vetted Board decisions in 2010.
The Board has remanded the case due to new evidence submitted by the appellant, and a supplemental statement of the case must be issued before further action can be taken.
The Veteran's basal cell carcinoma is due to in-service sun exposure and the Board has found service connection for this condition.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including a VA medical opinion regarding service connection for cardiac disease other than rheumatic heart disease.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for his claimed left foot, right foot, left leg deep venous insufficiency with ulcers, and right leg deep venous insufficiency with ulcers. The Board found no evidence linking these conditions to his active service.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including a VA examination to assess the severity of his bilateral alternating exotropia with intermittent diplopia and clarify any differences between diagnoses of exophoria and exotropia.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for increased evaluations for residuals of left great toe fracture and diverticulosis, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating under applicable diagnostic codes.
The Veteran's claim for educational assistance benefits under Chapter 30, Title 38, United States Code, for a period of on-the-job training prior to June 3, 2007 is denied as the retroactive date is from the date of receipt of the claim and benefits could not be received more than one year prior to VA's receipt of approval notice.
The Veteran's prostate carcinoma with impotence was rated at 20 percent from May 1, 2004 to May 24, 2004 and increased to 40 percent beginning on May 25, 2004. The appeal for higher ratings is denied.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for clarification of his claims and additional development of records.
The Board has remanded the case for further development and consideration of the claim, including adjudication under a secondary service connection theory.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's right ear otitis externa is related to active military service and granted entitlement. However, there is no evidence of a current diagnosis of right ear otitis media, thus denying this claim.
The Board has determined that the appellant does not have qualifying service to be eligible for the one-time payment from the Filipino Veterans Equity Compensation Fund.
The Board has granted an initial 20 percent evaluation for service-connected Raynaud's syndrome, which is the maximum schedular rating available.
The Veteran's total disability evaluation based on individual unemployability due to service connected disorders is not sufficient for an increased apportionment, and the appellant did not provide necessary income information.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's death was caused by a service-connected disability, and thus granted the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death.
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of degenerative arthritis of the back or hips, and these conditions are not shown to be related to service.
The Veteran's claim for increased ratings for Grave's disease is being remanded due to the need for additional medical records and a new VA examination.
The Board found no evidence to support service connection for the cause of death due to colon cancer, as there was no exposure to ionizing radiation and no medical opinion linking the condition to service.
The Veteran's appeal for a compensable evaluation for service-connected bursitis of the right shoulder has been granted, with a rating of 30 percent.
The Board denied the appellant's claims for service connection for multiple myeloma and cause of death, finding that there was no evidence to support a presumption of radiation exposure or direct service connection.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.