Other conditions decisions — 2010

The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death, and the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this claim.

The Board has determined that further examination and medical opinion are needed to resolve the claim for cardiovascular disability, as it is unclear whether the Veteran's current heart problems are related to service or his service-connected spine disabilities.

The Veteran seeks service connection for a malignant gastrointestinal stromal cell tumor, claimed as stomach cancer. The Board finds that additional development is needed to determine the etiology of the condition and whether it was due to radiation exposure during service.

The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to his request for a Travel Board hearing. His claim of entitlement to an increased disability rating for functional bowel syndrome remains pending.

The Board denied service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death due to a cancer of the floor of the mouth, which is not among those conditions presumed to be related to Agent Orange exposure.

The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection for a bilateral eye disorder based on new and material evidence. However, due to conflicting medical opinions and the need for further development, the claim is being remanded for additional examination and consideration.

The Veteran's claim for compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for ulcerative colitis, status post colectomy with ileostomy has been dismissed due to his death.

The appellant's claim for Dependents' Education Assistance under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 35 benefits is being remanded due to the need for additional development of her educational assistance file.

The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have an arthritis disorder manifested in all limbs that had onset during his active service or is etiologically related to his active service. As a result, the claim for service connection for arthritis of all limbs is denied.

The Veteran's appeal for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for otitis media has been dismissed due to the death of the appellant.

The Board has determined that the effective date for death pension benefits should be May 1, 2007 and payment should have started on June 1, 2007. The appellant disagrees with the amount of $37.00 per month she was awarded after a reduction from $52.00 in January 2008. Further clarification is needed regarding the calculation of her income and expenses to determine if the pension benefits were correctly calculated.

The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim of service connection for mitral valve prolapse. The Veteran likely had mitral valve insufficiency during her active military service, which is considered a direct result of disease or injury incurred in service.

The Veteran's income exceeded the VA National Means Test threshold for a Veteran with one dependent, resulting in his eligibility status being changed to require copayments for VA health care beginning January 18, 2007. The Board finds that the law is dispositive and denies the claim.

The Board has determined that the appellant did not have service as a member of the Philippine Commonwealth Army, including recognized guerrillas, in the service of the United States Armed Forces. Therefore, he does not meet the eligibility criteria for one-time payment from the Filipino Veterans Equity Compensation Fund.

The Veteran's income exceeded the maximum allowable limits for nonservice-connected pension, thus he does not meet eligibility requirements.

The Board has determined that the Veteran's Huntington's disease did not manifest during his military service and is not related to any in-service injury or illness. As a result, the claim for service connection is denied.

The Board found that the Veteran's current heart conditions are not related to his fever of unknown origin during service and denied both claims for service connection.

The Board dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's death, and no further action can be taken on this claim.

The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining medical records and a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's right elbow disability is related to carelessness or negligence by VA in October 2001.

The Board has determined that the overpayment of $3,606.00 is valid and not due to sole administrative error. The Veteran's failure to notify VA of his divorce in a timely manner contributed to the creation of the debt. Recovery of this amount would not result in undue financial hardship or defeat the purpose for which the benefits were intended.