Other conditions decisions — 2011
7,243 indexed Board decisions in 2011.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2011
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral knee disabilities are currently rated at 10 percent each, effective April 9, 2010. The evidence does not support a higher evaluation for either knee.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2011
The Board found that the Veteran did not have a current disability of his left hand and therefore denied service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2011
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a tumor of the lung due to asbestos exposure was denied because there was no evidence linking the surgery to military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2011
The Veteran sustained deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the right leg as a result of a May 2004 right knee operation. The Board finds that DVT was caused by the surgery, and the Veteran's failure to receive proper discharge instructions related to avoiding DVT did not constitute a minor deviation from informed consent requirements.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2011
The Veteran's son, the Appellant, does not have legal standing to claim entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318, death pension benefits, or accrued benefits due to his mother as he is not a dependant 'child' of the Veteran at the time of filing.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2011
The Veteran's daughter, the Appellant, does not have legal standing to claim entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318, death pension benefits, or accrued benefits due to her mother as she is not a dependant 'child' of the Veteran at the time of filing.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2011
The Veteran's daughter, the Appellant, does not have legal standing to claim entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318, death pension benefits, or accrued benefits due to her mother as she is not a dependant 'child' of the Veteran at the time of filing.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2011
The Veteran's death is not eligible for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation, death pension benefits, or accrued benefits as the Appellant does not meet the legal requirements to file these claims.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2011
The Veteran's son, the Appellant, does not have legal standing to claim entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318, death pension benefits, or accrued benefits due to his mother as he is not a dependant 'child' of the Veteran at the time of filing.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2011
The claims for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318, death pension benefits, and accrued benefits are dismissed as the Appellant lacks standing to claim these benefits on behalf of her mother.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2011
The Veteran's daughter, the Appellant, does not have legal standing to claim entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318, death pension benefits, or accrued benefits due to her mother as she is not a dependant 'child' of the Veteran at the time of filing.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2011
The Veteran's son, the Appellant, does not have legal standing to claim entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318, death pension benefits, or accrued benefits due to his mother as he is not a dependant 'child' of the Veteran for VA purposes.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2011
The Board found no evidence linking the Veteran's current chronic left eye disability and loss of vision to his service, including any in-service accident involving a practice grenade. The VA examiner concluded that the Veteran's cataracts are more likely related to age than to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's current gastrointestinal disorder and esophagitis were not related to her active duty for training, including as due to toxic gas exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2011
The Board has determined that the appellant's late husband did not have qualifying active service for VA benefits, and thus denied her claim of entitlement to basic eligibility for VA death benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's impotency is not related to his military service, including especially to a service-connected low back disability sustained in 1984.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2011
The Board denied the Veteran's claim of service connection for residuals of exposure to radiation, including arthritis, finding no new and material evidence to reopen the previously denied claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2011
The Veteran's initial evaluations for his right and left knee conditions have been granted at a 30 percent rating each, effective from the date of the decision.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2011
The Board has granted service connection for residuals of broken right toes and gastrointestinal disorder, but denied service connection for a right knee disability due to lack of current evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2011
The Board has determined that the most recent supplemental statement of the case was sent to an incorrect address and needs to be resent to the Veteran's correct address. The Veteran is given 30 days to respond.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.