Other conditions decisions — 2011
7,243 indexed Board decisions in 2011.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Veteran is seeking service connection for a right foot disorder, which he contends was caused by his service-connected disabilities. The case is being remanded to obtain updated treatment records and schedule the Veteran for an appropriate VA examination to determine if any diagnosed right foot disorder is related to his active duty service or his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a right eye injury is denied as there is no credible evidence linking the current condition to an incident in service.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2011
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death, and the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of the claim on appeal.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current bilateral hearing impairment is related to his period of active military service, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2011
The Veteran's residuals of cold injury to both feet have been rated at 30 percent since June 19, 2010. The conditions are characterized by pain, numbness or cold sensitivity, and various nail abnormalities and skin changes.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Veteran is seeking compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for additional disability (bilateral hand disfigurement) resulting from procedures performed on behalf of VA in March and June 2006. The case is remanded to secure medical records, obtain informed consent documentation, and schedule a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Veteran's cause of death, metastatic oral cancer and esophageal cancer, was not found to be related to his active service or any service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board found no evidence to support the Veteran's claims of service connection for a skin condition, cervical spine disability, or alopecia. The Veteran was not treated for these conditions during his military service and there is insufficient medical evidence linking them to his service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been presented to reopen the claim of service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, resulting in a denial.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2011
The Board has determined that the overpayment of VA benefits due to a change in marital status was properly created and denied the Veteran's claim for waiver of recovery.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Veteran's application for VA education benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill, Chapter 30 was denied because she did not meet the basic eligibility criteria of serving at least two years of continuous active duty in the Armed Forces.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2011
The Veteran's claim for increased ratings and service connection was granted, with a 20 percent rating assigned effective August 5, 2008. He is entitled to special monthly compensation based on need for aid and attendance since January 1, 2009.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Veteran's claims for educational assistance under the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB), MGIB-SR, and Reserve Educational Assistance Program (REAP) were denied as he did not meet eligibility criteria.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2011
The Veteran's bilateral elbow arthritis was incurred in service and is currently rated at 30%.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Veteran's appeal is denied as there is no apparent basis for education benefits during the interval period from June 3, 2009, to July 20, 2009.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Veteran's request to revoke his award for Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits (Chapter 33) in lieu of benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill program (Chapter 30) was denied as he made an irrevocable election.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran is not eligible for educational assistance benefits under Chapter 33, Title 38, United States Code (Post-9/11 GI Bill) due to a lack of qualifying service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Veteran's left eye corneal opacities with subconjunctival foreign body are subjectively associated with blurred vision and photophobia, but do not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a currently diagnosed bilateral hand disorder related to an in-service injury or treatment, and his bilateral foot disorder was not manifested during active service, within one year of separation, or causally related to an established event, injury, or disease during active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · June 2011
The Veteran's claim for VEAP benefits under Chapter 32 of the Veterans' Educational Assistance Program (VEAP) has been denied because he did not make required contributions during his service and therefore is ineligible.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.