Other conditions decisions — 2011
7,243 indexed Board decisions in 2011.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's stepsons (K., K., and K.) were not members of his household at the time of his death, and therefore they cannot be added as additional dependents to the appellant's death pension award.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection of residuals of schistosomiasis, but denied it due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's service-connected chondromalacia of the right knee does not warrant a rating in excess of 10 percent, as there is no evidence of ankylosis or recurrent subluxation. The current range of motion (extension to 4 degrees and flexion to 97 degrees) does not meet the criteria for higher ratings under Diagnostic Codes 5260 and 5261.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Veteran's military service does not meet the threshold eligibility requirements for VA pension benefits because it did not occur during a period of war.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board found that the appellant was not the legal spouse of the Veteran at the time of his death, as her marriage to him had been legally dissolved in 1993. As a result, she is not eligible for VA death benefits.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's death was caused by his gastrointestinal stromal tumor, which is considered a soft tissue sarcoma associated with exposure to Agent Orange. With resolution of reasonable doubt in favor of the appellant, service connection for the cause of death is granted.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2011
The Veteran's appeal of an earlier effective date for service connection for degenerative changes of the left acromioclavicular joint was dismissed as his claim had been subsumed by a prior Board decision and he did not file a motion for revision based on clear and unmistakable error (CUE).
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2011
The Veteran's representative withdrew the appeal for an increased rating for residuals of foreign object removal from left eye (claimed as vision).
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board has determined that the termination of Chapter 30 education benefits (Montgomery GI Bill) effective February 8, 2009 was proper due to unsatisfactory progress in the educational program.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been presented to reopen the claim of service connection for residuals of a back injury, as the additional evidence does not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Veteran's less than honorable discharge bars him from receiving educational assistance benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses incurred at a private hospital from April 14 to April 16, 2009 were denied as the treatment was not provided within 24 months of his last VA healthcare and no prior authorization for the emergency services was obtained.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board has determined that the appellant's annual income exceeds the maximum allowable rate for nonservice-connected death pension benefits since February 1, 2010.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Veteran's claim for nonservice-connected VA pension benefits is denied as he did not have wartime service and therefore is ineligible for these benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete information and need for further examination. The Veteran's skin disorder, including moles, is being reviewed again with a focus on obtaining service treatment records and private medical records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to the need for in-patient treatment records from Scott Air Force Base and further examination of the Veteran's claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Veteran claims additional disability due to a VA procedure on March 27, 2009 for prostate cancer. The claim is remanded for further development including securing medical records and arranging for an examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's dental condition is not service connected for compensation purposes due to lack of evidence showing a loss of substance of the maxilla or mandible, and because periodontal disease does not qualify as a compensable disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · June 2011
The Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of medical services provided by University Medical Center is denied as he received $1000.00 from a third party (homeowner insurance) and has not exhausted all claims against the third party.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Veteran's testicular cancer was not incurred in or aggravated by service and is not presumed to be due to exposure to herbicides. The claim for direct service connection has been denied.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.