Other conditions decisions — 2011
7,243 indexed Board decisions in 2011.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2011
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hallux valgus due to new and material evidence submitted since the last final denial. The claim will be readjudicated on its underlying merits.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's low back disorder is not proximately due to, the result of, or aggravated by service or a service-connected disease or injury.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA and private treatment records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for further development, including an increased rating for his service-connected mood disorder and a determination on the TDIU claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board found no current residuals of a shell fragment wound to the upper back and denied service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for his low back disability and heart disability were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating for either condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2011
The Board granted service connection for residuals of a fractured nose with a deviated nasal septum and assigned a 10 percent evaluation, effective May 9, 2005.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for benign prostatic hypertrophy and erectile dysfunction, finding that these conditions are not related to his military service or any incident therein.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board denied service connection for a ruptured tympanic membrane and the residuals of a head injury, finding that there was no current disability due to these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's claim for apportionment of his VA benefits to his three children was denied as the appellant did not meet the requirements for a general or special apportionment due to her financial situation and lack of hardship.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board found no evidence of the Veteran's presence in the Republic of Vietnam during August 1967, and thus denied service connection for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma due to Agent Orange exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral foot disabilities are not related to her period of active military service and denied her claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a chronic ophthalmological disability of the right eye, secondary to his service-connected Type II diabetes mellitus is being remanded due to incomplete records and procedural irregularities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination to assess the severity of his service-connected frozen feet residuals. The claim for a temporary total disability evaluation will also be remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · January 2011
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a skin condition, claimed to be the result of exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam, is pending. His claim for an initial rating higher than 10 percent for hiatal hernia with GERD is also pending and will be remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Veteran's hidradenitis suppurativa has worsened, requiring a VA examination and additional treatment records to determine the appropriate disability rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examination, consideration of a TDIU claim, and review of VA treatment records. The case will be returned to the Board for further review.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to complex nature of the Veteran's claim and new evidence presented.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2011
The Veteran is seeking a higher rating for her service-connected spinal stenosis. The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including obtaining updated treatment records and scheduling VA examinations.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2011
The Veteran's service-connected right eye disability, which was aggravated during service, is currently rated at 10 percent. The Board finds that an increased rating is not warranted as the current degree of disability does not exceed what would be present if the condition had been noted at entry to service.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.