Other conditions decisions — 2012
6,720 indexed Board decisions in 2012.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran's retrolisthesis of L5 on S1, diagnosed during his separation from service, is related to his military service and grants the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected psychosis associated with organic brain syndrome due to hallucinogenic drugs is being remanded for further development, including a VA examination and consideration of new medical records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining National Guard service treatment records and any pertinent outstanding treatment records. The claims of entitlement to service connection will be re-adjudicated after all development is completed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development of medical records, including VA and private hospitalization records from October 1967 to present.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to obtain updated treatment records and for an examination to determine the nature, extent, and etiology of any right hip disorders. The issue will be adjudicated again after these actions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma was denied because the skin cancer is not associated with herbicide exposure. The Board finds that a VA examination should be conducted to determine if there is any link between the current disability and active military service, including in-service sun exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine if the Veteran's service-connected ulcer condition contributed to his death, and a VA physician will be asked to provide an opinion on this issue.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected torticollis of the neck and upper back is being remanded due to a lack of recent VA examination. The case will be reviewed again after the examiner provides updated findings.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2012
The Veteran's epididymitis has been manifested by chronic testicular pain requiring continuous intensive management, to include long-term drug therapy. The Board finds that the criteria for an initial evaluation of 30 percent have been met throughout the period of appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Veteran's skin lipoma tumors are not shown to be related to his military service, and the Board finds that there is no evidence of continuity of symptomatology since service.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2012
The Veteran's neuritis of the right foot is considered to be a residual from surgery for his service-connected right ankle tendonitis, and thus is granted as secondary service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for a VA examination and consideration of his employment status.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Board has determined that the appellant's character of discharge is under other than honorable conditions due to persistent and willful misconduct, which bars him from receiving VA benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Veteran's claim for educational assistance benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill based on service commencing on July 14, 2010 is denied as she did not meet basic eligibility requirements due to her participation in the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) during this period.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2012
The Board has granted service connection for benign prostatic hypertrophy and assigned a 20 percent initial evaluation, effective from January 16, 2009. The Veteran's condition results in daytime voiding interval between one and two hours or awakening to void three to four times per night.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Veteran's claim for educational assistance under Chapter 30 of the United States Code was denied because he did not meet the eligibility criteria, as his application was received more than 10 years after his service ended.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2012
The Board finds that the Veteran did not make an irrevocable election for benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill program in lieu of benefits under the MGIB, and grants the appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran's actinic keratosis was not incurred in or aggravated by active service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Board has determined that there is no legal entitlement to a one-time payment from the Filipino Veterans Equity Compensation Fund as the appellant does not have recognized service in the U.S. Armed Forces, including service in the Philippine Commonwealth Scouts or Recognized Guerilla Forces.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Veteran's appeal involves multiple issues related to his service-connected conditions, including lung disorder, bilateral femoral atherosclerosis, and cerebrovascular accident. The case is being remanded for additional development, including VA examinations and opinions regarding the relationship of these conditions to herbicide exposure.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.