Other conditions decisions — 2012
6,720 indexed Board decisions in 2012.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2012
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development to obtain medical records and determine the reason for his gall bladder surgery refusal at a VA facility.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2012
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for further development and adjudication of his service connection claim for residuals of a gunshot wound to the right thigh with supracondylar femur fracture, claimed as secondary to service-connected knee disabilities. The temporary total evaluation based on surgical or other treatment necessitating convalescence under 38 C.F.R. � 4.30 is also inextricably intertwined and must be addressed concurrently.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2012
The Veteran's claim for additional compensation benefits for his grandchild, K.T., is denied as she does not meet the legal criteria to be considered a dependent for VA purposes.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2012
The Board found that the Veteran's bowel incontinence was not incurred during service and is not related to his service-connected cholangiocarcinoma. Therefore, he did not meet the criteria for service connection for this condition as an accrued benefits claim.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJune 2012
The Board has reviewed new evidence submitted by the appellant, including a VA opinion and private treatment records. The May 2009 VA opinion does not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim for service connection due to PTSD or alcohol dependence. The December 2011 VHA opinion also found no service connection is warranted based on these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2012
The Board has determined that there is conflicting medical evidence regarding the Veteran's need for aid and attendance or housebound status. The case is being remanded to obtain additional information from a clinician.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2012
The Board found that the Veteran's respiratory disabilities, including left pleural effusion, benign mesothelial hyperplasia, emphysema, and chronic inflammation and fibrosis, were not incurred or aggravated by service. The Board concluded that these conditions are more likely due to his cardiac surgery in 2007 rather than asbestos or ionizing radiation exposure during active duty.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2012
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the Veteran's claim for service connection for urethritis, which was previously denied in February 2003. The Veteran is found to have presented credible lay assertions sufficient to establish a continuity of symptomatology referable to symptoms of urethritis while in active service and since separation from active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2012
The Board found no evidence of a relationship between the Veteran's inguinal hernia and his service, including any in-service injury or disease. The claim is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2012
The Board denied the appellant's claim for legal entitlement to the one-time payment from the Filipino Veterans Equity Compensation Fund due to a lack of qualified service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2012
The Board has determined that the original grant of service connection for residuals of thoracic fusion with scoliosis was clearly and unmistakably erroneous due to preexisting conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2012
The Board has remanded the case for further development and review of a VHA opinion, as notification to the Veteran was not provided.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2012
The Board determined that the Veteran's transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) on March 15, 2006 made him ineligible for Chapter 1607 educational benefits. As a result, VA stopped paying these benefits and adjusted his delimiting date accordingly. This led to an overpayment of $5,674.90 which was subsequently offset by other benefits, leaving the Veteran with a valid debt that cannot be waived.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran's skin condition manifested by tinea versicolor is related to his active service and grants this claim. The muscle and joint pain claim remains pending as there is insufficient evidence to grant service connection.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2012
The Board dismissed the Veteran's appeal because he did not file a timely notice of disagreement with the June 2005 decision denying his request for waiver of overpayment of disability compensation benefits.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2012
The Veteran's initial compensable evaluation for his left foot disability is granted from June 18, 2006 to May 24, 2011. An increased rating of 10 percent is granted from May 25, 2011 forward (excluding a period when a 100% evaluation was assigned).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2012
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including scheduling an echocardiogram and a contrast-enhanced CT of the chest. The Veteran's private treatment records are also to be obtained.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2012
The Veteran's shell fragment wounds to the left upper extremity resulted in a 30 percent rating, with separate ratings for muscle injuries and amputation of the little finger. The decision grants these claims.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran's alcohol and substance abuse is related to his service-connected major depressive disorder, resolving all doubt in favor of the Veteran.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2012
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a dental disability and higher initial rating for TMJ. The case is being remanded to obtain relevant treatment records from private providers.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.