Other conditions decisions — 2012
6,720 indexed Board decisions in 2012.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2012
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a VA examination to assess the severity of his left upper extremity disability and whether he is unemployable due to service-connected disabilities. The case will be referred to the Director, Compensation and Pension Service, for extraschedular consideration.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2012
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining chest X-rays and pulmonary function test results. The Veteran's lung disability is being evaluated to determine if it is related to exposure to asbestos during service.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2012
The Veteran's left knee disability, characterized by post-traumatic degenerative joint disease with frequent episodes of locking, pain and effusion, was found to warrant a 20 percent rating effective from the date of the initial claim.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedApril 2012
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a left foot crush injury, but the issue remains on remand to determine if there is new and material evidence to reopen it. The Veteran's current left foot disability may be related to his active service, but further examination is needed to clarify this.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2012
The Board has determined that a remand is necessary to obtain an addendum medical opinion regarding the Veteran's left leg shin splints and whether it is related to service. The Veteran will be given another opportunity to provide any additional evidence needed for his claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2012
The Veteran's symptoms of Crohn's disease have most nearly approximated severe impairment with numerous attacks per year and malnutrition, warranting a 60 percent rating. The claim for TDIU is also granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2012
The Board has determined that macular degeneration is proximately due to or the result of service-connected atrial fibrillation and hypertension, and thus grants the Veteran's claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected disability, and thus denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2012
The Veteran's claim for benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 is denied as there is no evidence of additional disability caused by VA care.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service-connected index and long finger disabilities have not improved since their original grant of service connection, warranting restoration of the previously assigned ratings.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a fungal infection of the feet is being remanded due to insufficient evidence regarding its onset during active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2012
The Board denied the Appellant's claim for death pension, finding that the Veteran did not qualify under the provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.3(b)(4) due to lack of service-connected disability at time of discharge.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2012
The Veteran claims service connection for residuals of a left hip injury sustained in February 1953 during military training. The Board has determined that additional development is needed, including searching for records and scheduling an examination to determine the relationship between the current condition and service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2012
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's skin disorder and a VA audiological examination to assess his bilateral hearing loss disability. The issues of service connection for a skin disorder (presumptive due to Agent Orange exposure) and entitlement to higher rating for bilateral hearing loss remain pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2012
The Board has remanded the case due to a procedural defect in the issuance of an SOC for the initial evaluation of bladder floor compression. The Veteran is entitled to receive an SOC and must file a timely substantive appeal if he wishes to continue his appeal on this issue.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2012
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death, and the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of the claim for service connection for esophageal cancer.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2012
The Board finds that the Veteran's bilateral foot drop is secondary to his service-connected shell fragment wounds to both legs. The Veteran's service-connected disabilities rendered him unable to care for his daily personal needs or protect himself from the hazards and dangers of daily living without care or assistance on a regular basis.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2012
The Veteran's initial claim for a higher rating for his right knee disability was denied, and he is currently rated at 10 percent. The Board also denied his TDIU prior to December 28, 2002.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2012
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected residuals of a shrapnel wound to the left thigh, with a retained foreign body involving Muscle Group XIII is being remanded due to incomplete information from the April 2011 VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2012
The Veteran claims that VA negligence caused her gallbladder condition to worsen, resulting in additional disability. The Board finds this claim requires further development with a medical examination.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.