Other conditions decisions — 2015
7,313 indexed Board decisions in 2015.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Veteran's patellofemoral syndrome of the right knee was manifested by subjective complaints of pain, stiffness, weakness, decreased speed, and limited flexibility. The clinical evidence showed range of motion from 0 to 90 degrees in flexion and 10 to 0 degrees in extension. Based on these findings, an initial rating in excess of 10 percent disabling for the period from January 15, 2008 until April 14, 2010 is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board found that the appellant's character of discharge as under other than honorable conditions constitutes a bar to basic eligibility for VA benefits due to his AWOL periods and acceptance of an undesirable discharge.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for a new VA examination and clarification of the appropriate rating code.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Veteran's carcinoma of the left tonsil is being remanded for a VA examination to determine if it may be related to his military service, including herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Board has determined that additional development is necessary before the appeal can be further considered, including obtaining medical records and information regarding the appellant's criminal charges.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board denied the Appellant's claim for accrued benefits as there were no pending claims or unpaid benefits at the time of her mother's death.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · December 2015
The Veteran's death was caused by his service-connected myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myelogenous leukemia, which were presumed to be due to Agent Orange exposure. The appellant is also granted accrued benefits for MDS and AML.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Veteran's service does not qualify for Post-9/11 GI Bill educational assistance benefits as he did not serve the required active duty after September 10, 2001. The Board finds him ineligible.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Veteran's claim for VRAP eligibility is being remanded due to the need for additional records and a supplemental statement of the case.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Veteran's request for an extension of the delimiting date for Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) education benefits was denied as his application was not timely and he did not meet the requirement of physical or mental disability that prevented him from initiating or completing the chosen program.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining private treatment records and addressing the Veteran's concerns regarding VA dental treatment. The appeal is currently in a pending state.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Board has determined that further development is needed to address the Veteran's cardiac disability claim and determine if his service-connected conditions contributed to his death. The case is being remanded for additional examination and opinion.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Veteran's claim for educational assistance at the 100 percent rate under the Post-9/11 GI Bill was denied as he did not meet the required length of service (at least 36 months) to qualify for this benefit.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current diverticulitis is not related to service, including his in-service treatment for urinary tract infections and a possible poisoning incident. The evidence does not support a finding of service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses at St. Mary's of Michigan were denied as VA facilities were feasibly available and the emergency treatment was not rendered in a true medical emergency.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board found that the Veteran's evisceration of his right eye was not caused by VA medical care, and thus denied compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board has determined that the Veteran did not have qualifying wartime service and was not receiving or entitled to receive compensation for a service-connected disability based on service during a period of war. Therefore, the appellant's son (C.J.N.) is not eligible for VA death pension benefits as a helpless child.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to outstanding VA treatment records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Veteran's chronic carcinoma of the bladder is being referred to the Under Secretary for Benefits for further consideration due to potential exposure to ionizing radiation during service. The case will be remanded for this review and possible grant of service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2015
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses for emergency treatment of a severe hand infection at Florida Hospital Flagler were approved due to the severity and urgency of his condition, as well as the unavailability of VA facilities within a reasonable distance.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.