Other conditions decisions — 2015
7,313 indexed Board decisions in 2015.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Veteran's appeal is denied as he is not entitled to additional VA educational assistance benefits in excess of 3 months and 6 days as of June 26, 2012.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Board has remanded the case due to issues related to the validity of the debt amount, and the Veteran's offer to compromise the debt at $12,352.60 will be considered.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The VA determined that the Veteran's low back disorder, including degenerative disc disease (DDD), was not incurred or aggravated by service and may not be presumed to have been. The preponderance of evidence fails to establish an etiological link between any diagnosed low back disability and military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2015
The Veteran's request for a partial waiver of recovery of his overpayment in the amount of $12,324.00 was granted due to the lack of fault on his part and undue hardship resulting from his disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a new VA examination to assess the percentage of body area affected by dermatophytosis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to his request for a hearing. The issues of entitlement to service connection for stomach and bowel conditions are still pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2015
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses incurred from April 21, 2012 to April 22, 2012 are now approved as the condition was still considered a medical emergency and not stable enough for discharge or transfer.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Board denied the Appellant's claim for nonservice-connected death pension benefits due to her income exceeding the statutory maximum rate.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Board finds that the Veteran's respiratory disability is not related to his active service, including any exposure to asbestos. As such, the claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2015
The Veteran's service-connected large angle esotropia is rated at 30 percent, and her TDIU claim has been granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Board denied the appellant's claim for benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1805 for a disability due to spina bifida because there is no competent evidence that the appellant has this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Board found that the appellant's income exceeded the maximum annual pension rate (MAPR) for payment of VA death pension benefits with aid and attendance allowance, thus denying her claim.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2015
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to his death. The Board does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Veteran's request for waiver of overpayment was not timely filed, and therefore the appeal is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for post-operative left inguinal herniorrhaphy with entrapment of the left ilio-inguinal nerve was denied as he failed to report for a scheduled VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2015
The Board has determined that the Veteran's schizoaffective disorder, which is manifested as anxiety and depression, was permanently aggravated beyond normal progression during his second period of active service resulting in a manifestation of schizoaffective disorder.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Board found that the Veteran's gastrointestinal disorder, including duodenal ulcer and peptic ulcer disease, preexisted service and was not aggravated by service. The presumption of soundness at entry is rebutted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Veteran's ileostomy surgery is being reviewed for compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 due to alleged VA malpractice, and additional development is needed to consider private treatment records from Banner Baywood Hospital.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2015
The Board found insufficient evidence to conclude that the Veteran directly participated in a scheme to defraud VA, and thus concluded that the overpayment was not validly created.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2015
The Veteran's appeal for a TDIU has been withdrawn, resulting in the dismissal of this matter.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.