Other conditions decisions — 2016
5,937 indexed Board decisions in 2016.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2016
The Veteran is seeking reimbursement for unauthorized medical expenses incurred at Saint Vincent Medical Center from May 3, 2011 to May 5, 2011. The case has been remanded due to the need to determine if the Veteran was enrolled in the VA health care system and received care at a VA facility within the previous 24 months, as well as obtaining relevant billing statements.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2016
The Veteran's gallbladder condition, diagnosed as cholelithiasis and confirmed by a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, is presumed to have been incurred during service due to its manifestation within one year of his discharge. Service connection is granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2016
The Veteran's cause of death was determined to be metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon, which is service-connected.,Burial benefits have been granted for the Veteran.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2016
The case is REMANDED for the following action: (1) The AOJ should contact the Veteran and request that he submit information concerning the date his father died, and the income and expenses of his parents from September 2009 to the present. (2) If the benefits sought are denied, the AOJ should furnish the Veteran and his representative a supplemental statement of the case, afford him opportunity to respond, and return the case to the Board.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2016
The Board found that the Veteran's current skin disorder is not shown to be etiologically related to his active military service and may not be presumed to have been incurred or aggravated by such service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ) for further action, including obtaining and verifying his service personnel records. The AOJ will then readjudicate the eligibility for VA Post-9/11 GI Bill (Chapter 33) educational assistance benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2016
The Veteran's claim for service connection for Waldenstrom's disease was received on February 29, 2012. The effective date of the grant of service connection is set to this date as it is the earliest possible date based on the criteria provided by VA.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2016
The Veteran's active duty service does not bar her from receiving VA loan guaranty benefits, and the claim is granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2016
The Veteran's condition stabilized on July 9, 2013, allowing for transfer to a VA facility. The claim is granted for payment of medical expenses incurred on July 9, 2013 at Providence Regional Medical Center Everett.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2016
The Board has remanded the case due to a discrepancy in the number of credit hours associated with the Veteran's classes, which were originally considered worth four credit hours each. The Veteran submitted evidence showing that these classes are worth 4.5 credit hours each.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2016
The Veteran's postoperative residuals of a right thoracotomy resection apical bleb are currently rated at 30 percent, and the Board finds that this rating is appropriate given his current pulmonary function test results.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2016
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased evaluation are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and securing VA examination opinions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2016
The Veteran's claim for service connection for jungle rot of the feet is being remanded due to insufficient medical opinion regarding the relationship between his current condition and his in-service diagnosis.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2016
The Board determined that the appellant's discharge was under dishonorable conditions due to willful and persistent misconduct, but found no evidence of insanity at the time. As a result, his character of discharge bars him from receiving VA benefits.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2016
From June 12, 2013, the Veteran's dermatophytosis was manifested by constant or near-constant systemic therapy such as corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs required during the past 12-month period. The Board granted a 60 percent rating for this condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records from Middlesex Hospital and Social Security Administration records. The case will be reviewed again after these records are obtained.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2016
The Veteran's right knee disability, characterized by slight instability, does not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation than the current 10 percent rating.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2016
Your appeal has been dismissed due to the Veteran's death. The Board does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate your claim as you are no longer alive.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2016
The Veteran's degenerative arthrosis of the great metatarsal phalangeal joint and residuals of deep vein thrombosis, with post phlebitis syndrome, of the left foot/leg were caused by in-service cold exposure. Service connection is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2016
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for his fractured right third metatarsal, and also denied service connection for a low back disorder and a left lower extremity disorder. The claims for an acquired psychiatric disorder were remanded.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.