Other conditions decisions — 2016
5,937 indexed Board decisions in 2016.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board denied service connection for the Veteran's status post C4-6 laminectomy/foraminotomy and fusion, finding that his current disability is not causally or etiologically related to his active military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Veteran's claims for an extraschedular evaluation greater than 30 percent for irritable colon syndrome and a total disability rating based on unemployability due to service-connected disabilities were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support granting these benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2016
The Board has remanded the claim for service connection for tremors due to insufficient examination and opinion regarding the etiology of the condition, including whether it is related to PTSD, alcohol use, or medications used to treat PTSD.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left lower extremity disorder, including weakness and swelling, cellulitis, venous valvular incompetency, venous stasis, and varicose veins, is related to his service. The decision grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2016
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and inadequate medical opinion. The Veteran's urinary disorder, including benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), is being reviewed for service connection. Additional efforts are required to obtain Camp Shelby medical records from June 1967 to September 1967 and around April 4, 1968. A supplemental VA examination opinion must be obtained to determine if the Veteran's current urinary disorder was caused by in-service complaints of urethritis and urethral discharge.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2016
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including residuals of frost bite to multiple body parts, have resulted in a combined rating of 90 percent. The Veteran is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation due to his service-connected disabilities and the case is being referred for extraschedular TDIU consideration.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2016
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to the death of the Veteran, and no jurisdiction remains for the merits of the case.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for disability manifested by chest pains, other than the service-connected muscle group XXI injury, as there is no evidence of a separate and distinct disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Veteran's urinary incontinence due to chronic cystitis is currently rated at 20 percent, but does not warrant a higher rating as there is no evidence of the required frequency or use of absorbent materials.,The Veteran's Guillain-Barre syndrome with bowel incontinence is currently rated at 10 percent and does not warrant a higher rating due to lack of residuals attributable to the condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2016
The Veteran's dysthymic disorder resulted in occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity, warranting a disability rating of 50 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board finds that the appellant did not use any VEAP benefits during his original period of eligibility and does not meet the criteria for an extension of the deliminating period. Therefore, entitlement to educational assistance under Chapter 32, Title 38, United States Code is denied.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2016
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn due to the grant of service connection for left femoral cutaneous neuropathy, effectively rendering the separate claim moot.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board determined that the appellant's other than honorable discharge was due to a period of AWOL exceeding 180 days, which is considered dishonorable for VA purposes and thus bars him from VA benefits based on this period of service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Veteran's right fifth finger disability has been manifested by complaints of pain; the limitation of finger function is not equivalent to amputation. The criteria for a higher rating have not been met.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2016
The Veteran's left hip disability was rated at 20 percent prior to January 5, 2010. After undergoing total hip replacement surgery on that date, the rating was increased to 100 percent from February 5, 2010 to February 28, 2011 and then reduced back to 30 percent starting March 1, 2011.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a TMJ disorder and a skin disorder are denied as there is no evidence of a current disability related to his active duty service or any service-connected condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board found that the retroactive termination of the Veteran's additional disability compensation benefits for a dependent spouse effective January 1, 2005 was proper.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board denied the appellant's claim for a one-time payment from the Filipino Veterans Equity Compensation Fund due to lack of service as a member of the Philippine Commonwealth Army, including recognized guerrillas.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to his request for a Board hearing. The case will be returned to the AOJ for further action.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board has determined that a chronic left hip disorder was not incurred in or aggravated by service and is not causally related to or aggravated by a service-connected disability. The Veteran's claim for service connection for a right knee degenerative joint disease is remanded as the most recent VA examination is over 67 months old.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.