Other conditions decisions — 2016
5,937 indexed Board decisions in 2016.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2016
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection for partial removal of the colon, finding that it is at least as likely as not related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2016
The Veteran's service-connected pilonidal cyst residuals are currently rated at 10 percent, and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted based on the evidence of record.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2016
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and clinical records from the NPRC. The Veteran will be provided with a new VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of any right elbow disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2016
The Veteran's strokes are being remanded for further development, including consideration of whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim for service connection for a colon disability. The issue will be decided by the originating agency before the Board makes its final decision.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedMarch 2016
The Veteran is seeking service connection for mild spondyloarthropathy, disc bulge at L5-S1, mild canal stenosis and mild disc desiccation. The Board has determined that the Veteran meets the schedular requirements for a TDIU effective January 1, 2016.,The Veteran also seeks a TDIU prior to November 11, 2013 due to his service-connected knee disabilities. This claim is being referred to the Director of Compensation Service for extraschedular consideration under 38 C.F.R. § 4.16(b).,A VA back examination was conducted in June 2014 but did not provide a clear opinion regarding whether the Veteran's current back condition is related to his service-connected bilateral knee disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2016
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his back disability was granted, with the effective date being January 28, 2011. The issue of TDIU remains on appeal.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2016
The Veteran's service-connected PTSD is found to have caused his current left hand disorder, which the Board finds was not willful misconduct. The Board grants service connection for residuals of a left hand injury from an in-service motor vehicle accident.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2016
The Veteran's residuals of a stress fracture of the right hip have been rated at 30 percent since April 2008, based on limitation of abduction and motion lost beyond 10 degrees without evidence of malunion or nonunion.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2016
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to incomplete medical opinions and failure to address the Veteran's history of both service and post-service asbestos exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2016
The case is being remanded for additional development, including the submission of financial information and an updated Corpus of Estate Determination Form. The AOJ will then re-adjudicate the issue on appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claimed T-8 fracture residuals do not exist and, therefore, service connection for these residuals is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left fourth finger disability is related to an in-service injury and granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2016
The Board found that the Veteran's muscular dystrophy is not service-connected as it was a congenital defect and did not worsen during his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2016
The Board has remanded the claims for further development due to incomplete examination reports and other evidentiary deficiencies.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2016
The Board has ordered a remand to obtain additional medical opinions and treatment records, as well as to address the November 2011 positive opinion from Dr. A.A.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's sinus disorder did not begin during service and is not related to any injury or disease sustained in service. Therefore, the claim for service connection for a sinus disorder is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2016
The Veteran's claim for service connection for cicatricial pemphigoid is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining more recent VA treatment records and scheduling a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development to assess the extent of his service-connected right rib contusion and its impact on his ability to lift, bend, and perform activities related to the right lower ribcage.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2016
The Board has determined that the appellant does not have qualifying service in the United States Armed Forces and therefore, he is not eligible for the one-time payment from the Filipino Veterans Equity Compensation Fund.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2016
The Veteran's skin disorder did not meet the criteria for a higher schedular rating, and his appeal for an extraschedular rating is denied. Service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder was also denied.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.