Other conditions decisions — 2016
5,937 indexed Board decisions in 2016.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2016
The Veteran's effective function in his right hand is so diminished due to service-connected disabilities that it is equivalent to the loss of use of one hand, which would be equally well served by an amputation stump with a suitable prosthetic appliance.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2016
The Veteran's left fifth finger disability, manifested by pain and limited motion, does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under applicable VA regulations.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have current disabilities for purposes of service connection. Specifically, there is no evidence of residuals of a Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) or Myocardial Infarction Residuals.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2016
The Board has remanded the case for further development and to schedule a videoconference hearing in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2016
The Board finds that the Veteran's service connection claim for residuals of a cold injury, left foot is granted as his statements regarding exposure to cold weather during service are credible and supported by medical evidence. The claim is granted due to the Veteran's in-service exposure to cold weather.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2016
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining medical opinions and private treatment records. The Veteran's claim of service connection for an enlarged prostate is being reviewed.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2016
The VA determined that the Veteran's pre-existing left elbow disorder existed prior to his service and did not worsen during his period of service, thus denying his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hip degenerative joint disease is related to his service-connected right ankle disability and grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2016
The Veteran's claims for service connection were denied, and the appeal was not successful. The Board found that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen his claim for residuals of a snakebite of the right arm. His claims for rectal dysfunction, eye disorder, bladder disorder, and PTSD were also denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2016
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral cataracts, to include as secondary to diabetes mellitus type II and/or exposure to herbicides, is being remanded due to the need for a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2016
The Board has determined that the appellant's volunteer work with the Coast Guard Auxiliary, while considered service for compensation purposes, is not recognized as active military, naval or air service in the Armed Forces of the United States. Therefore, his amputation, right great toe, was not incurred in or aggravated by active service and service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2016
The overpayment of $7807.00 in death pension benefits for the period from February 2011 to July 2014 has been waived by the Committee on Waivers and Compromises, thus making the issue moot.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2016
The Board found that the April 1978 rating decision did not contain clear and unmistakable error, thus denying the Veteran's petition to reopen his claim for service connection for nervousness.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2016
The Veteran's claim for service connection for gastrointestinal cancer is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining updated VA treatment records and an addendum opinion from a medical professional.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including scheduling a videoconference hearing. The issue of entitlement to service connection for a total disability rating due to individual unemployability (TDIU) based on service-connected disabilities remains pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2016
The Veteran's surviving spouse applied for DIC benefits on October 22, 2012. The claim was denied in February 2013 due to lack of supporting evidence. In March 2014, the appellant provided the necessary information and the RO granted DIC benefits with an effective date set at March 26, 2014. The appellant did not file a timely notice of disagreement regarding this decision, making it final. As such, no earlier effective date is warranted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2016
The case is being remanded for the VA to provide the Veteran's appointed attorney an opportunity to review the file and submit any additional evidence or argument in support of the claim. The appeal will then be readjudicated.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2016
The Board found that the termination of MGIB-SR education benefits for the period from November 11 to November 24, 2013 was proper as the Veteran withdrew from her only enrolled course and did not enroll in another class.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2016
The Veteran's service-connected osteonecrosis of the bilateral hips results in permanent and total loss of use of his lower extremities, qualifying him for specially-adapted housing or a special home adaptation grant.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining private medical records and providing the Veteran with another opportunity to submit such records. Additionally, a VA opinion from a specialist in genitourinary conditions will be obtained to determine if his benign prostate disorder is related to his presumed in-service herbicide exposure.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.