Other conditions decisions — 2016
5,937 indexed Board decisions in 2016.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2016
The Board is remanding the claim to determine if the Veteran's military service caused or contributed substantially or materially to his death from cardiac arrhythmia due to electrolyte dysfunction, specifically related to his alleged exposure to Lindane while treating for lice.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Board has determined that the cause of death was not service-connected, and therefore denied the claim for service connection for the cause of death.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The VA treatment for peri-rectal abscesses and subsequent surgeries did not result in additional disability due to fault on the part of VA, as the complications were expected and disclosed.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Board found that the Veteran's discharge from service was dishonorable due to a court-martial sentence, and thus his eligibility for VA benefits is barred.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for additional benefits due to his daughter pursuing a course of instruction at an educational institution approved by VA lacks legal merit as the required claim was not filed within one year of her 18th birthday.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2016
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims due to the need for additional development, including obtaining a VA examination and issuing a Statement of the Case (SOC).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional examinations to determine the current severity of his right thumb injury and nephrology condition, including the frequency of colic attacks. The case will be readjudicated after these actions.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's National Guard service is not considered active service during a period of war, and therefore he does not meet the eligibility criteria for non-service connected pension benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2016
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine the current nature and severity of the Veteran's service-connected non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, including whether it is an active disease or during a treatment phase. The case will be remanded for these purposes.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Veteran is seeking Chapter 33 (Post-9/11 GI Bill) education benefits for coursework completed more than one year prior to his October 2013 date of claim. The Board finds he has no legal entitlement to such benefits as the effective date must be based on the date of claim, and there does not appear to be any dispute regarding the Veteran's eligibility for benefits during the period in question.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2016
The Board has determined that the effective date for DIC should be changed from October 1, 2003 to September 1, 2003 due to clear and unmistakable error in the original decision.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2016
The Veteran is entitled to education housing payments for the period from December 16, 2013, through February 20, 2014.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Board denied reopening the claim for chronic liver disease due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's appeal is denied as he does not meet the eligibility criteria for VA educational assistance benefits under Chapter 30 (Montgomery GI Bill or MGIB) due to his discharge being due to alcohol rehabilitation failure.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's malignant brain cancer was caused by exposure to herbicides and asbestos during service, leading to a grant of DIC based on service connection for the cause of death.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Board denied service connection for breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, finding that the evidence did not support a link to exposure at Camp Lejeune.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Board finds that the Veteran's retinopathy is not caused or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2016
The Board has remanded the cases due to scheduling issues for a third hearing before a different Veterans Law Judge.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's right foot disability has been evaluated as a single condition, and the current rating of 10 percent is deemed appropriate given his symptoms.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for myasthenia gravis, finding that there was no evidence linking his condition to his active duty or ionizing radiation exposure. The preponderance of the evidence did not support a grant of service connection.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.