Other conditions decisions — 2016
5,937 indexed Board decisions in 2016.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2016
The Veteran's initial compensable rating for his right foot disability prior to December 15, 2015 is granted. For the period beginning December 15, 2015, a higher rating is not warranted as there is no evidence of actual loss of use of the foot.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of a chronic allergy or sinus disability as a result of service, and thus denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2016
The Board found that the Veteran's scalp rash with hair loss to include alopecia is not related to an undiagnosed illness or a chronic multi-symptom illness, and thus service connection cannot be granted under the presumptive provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.317. The examiner determined that the rash and hair loss were due to lupus, which was not caused by military service.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedSeptember 2016
The Board has reopened the claim of entitlement to service connection for bilateral macular degeneration, but denied it on the merits due to lack of evidence linking current macular degeneration to service.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2016
The Board finds that the Veteran has a current diagnosis of actinic keratosis, which is service connected. The issue of painful joints (unspecified) was not addressed as there were no diagnosed conditions.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2016
The Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities has been granted and is effective September 25, 2007. The appeal is dismissed as the full benefit sought has already been awarded.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2016
The Veteran's gout resulted in both non-incapacitating and incapacitating episodes, but did not result in constitutional manifestations associated with active joint involvement that was totally incapacitating. The Board found the disability picture presented by the Veteran's gout shows no more than a 60 percent disability rating for the entire appellate period.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2016
The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 20 percent for gout of the right big toe was denied. The Board found that the Veteran failed to report for a scheduled VA examination and thus, his claim would be denied without further action.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2016
The Board has determined that the appellant does not have qualifying service and therefore is not eligible for a one-time payment from the FVEC Fund or other VA benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2016
The Veteran's bilateral hand neuropathic symptoms have been rated as 10 percent disabling, and his bilateral upper extremity tremors have not resulted in mild, incomplete paralysis of the upper radicular group (5th and 6th cervicals).,Based on VA examinations and medical records, the Veteran's right and left hand neuropathic symptoms are currently evaluated at 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2016
The Veteran's first degree heart block is currently evaluated as noncompensable under the applicable rating criteria. The Board finds that his condition does not meet or approximate the criteria for a compensable disability rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2016
The Board has determined that the appellant's claim for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses incurred on April 27, 2009 was timely filed and is therefore granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's right-sided arachnoid cyst and eye disability were not incurred in service, as there is no causal connection between these conditions and his military service. The claims are therefore denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2016
The Veteran does not have chronic residuals of Legionnaires' disease, to include claimed fatigue and muscle weakness, as the result of VA medical treatment at Brecksville VA Medical Center in July 2006.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2016
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses for treatment of cellulitis on June 22, 2015 were denied as the services were not rendered in a medical emergency and VA facilities were feasibly available.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2016
The Veteran is entitled to an increased level of SMC based on the need for higher level aid and attendance due to his upper extremity disabilities, loss of use of both legs, bladder/bowel incontinence, and the need for aid and attendance. The effective date is September 27, 2016.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2016
The Veteran's diagnosed papillary squamous cell carcinoma was not associated with his active duty service and the evidence does not support a finding of exposure to radiation or herbicides. As such, the claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2016
The Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of sarcoma, right arm, status post amputation is granted. The Board finds that the Veteran's sarcoma is at least as likely as not related to his active military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to an undeliverable hearing notice. The case will be scheduled for a new videoconference hearing at the RO.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2016
The Veteran's service-connected muscle injury to Muscle Group III is currently rated at 20 percent, which is the highest available rating under Diagnostic Code 5303. The Board finds that this rating adequately reflects the severity of his disability.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.