Other conditions decisions — 2019
15,079 indexed Board decisions in 2019.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board has denied service connection for chest pain and weakness on the left side from foot to neck, finding that there is no evidence of a nexus between these conditions and active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board denied an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for the service-connected residuals of a partial amputation of the third left finger, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the criteria governing amputation of the long finger.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient examination and treatment records, as well as the need for an additional VA examination to assess the severity of the service-connected right hip disorder.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claim for a rating increase for his macular pucker of the right eye due to incomplete development and need for additional evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete documentation and unclear calculation of overpayment. The Veteran's challenge of the validity of the debt is inextricably intertwined with his waiver claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for residuals of dislocated left side ribs and her TDIU claim were both denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a finding of severe or moderately severe residuals of dislocated left side ribs, and that the Veteran’s service-connected disabilities did not result in total occupational impairment.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Veteran's service connection claim for gouty arthritis in the right first toe is granted. The claim for NHL was denied as there is no evidence of a chronic disease or continuous symptoms after service separation.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2019
The appeal was dismissed because a timely Notice of Disagreement (NOD) was not filed within one year of the November 2015 denial, and the claim for dependency benefits for the Veteran's daughter was subsequently granted in September 2017.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination regarding the upper extremities, specifically Raynaud’s syndrome.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Board has granted service connection for residuals of a hemangioma tumor affecting the Veteran's left optic nerve, finding that it manifested during or within one year of his active duty.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The appeal for whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen a claim of entitlement to service connection for ruptured eardrums is granted. The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations for his right hip tendonitis, left knee injury residuals with instability, and left knee injury residuals with limitation of flexion are remanded.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2019
The Board dismissed the Veteran's appeals for service connection for residuals of burns on the abdomen, groin, and hand. The claim seeking service connection for residuals of burns on bilateral thighs is remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has decided that the Veteran's claim for an increased evaluation of his service-connected residuals of a left fibula fracture should be remanded due to internal contradictions in the most recent examination report. The case will be returned to VA for further development and assessment.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding insufficient evidence to link the pancreatic cancer with service or a service-connected condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · May 2019
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient competent medical evidence linking the Veteran's colon cancer to his presumed exposure to Agent Orange during service. The AOJ must request an advisory opinion from a medical expert to determine if it is at least as likely as not that the Veteran’s colon cancer is related to his military service, including his presumptive in-service exposure to herbicide agents.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has decided to remand the issues of overpayment due to unreported income and change in number of dependents, as well as waivers for these overpayments. The AOJ is instructed to gather more information from the Veteran regarding his income and living situation between 2001 and 2005.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling examinations.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Veteran's ingrown toenail of the left great toe was initially rated at 10% from September 30, 2015 to September 9, 2016. After that period, a zero percent rating was assigned as there is no current disabling symptomatology.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Veteran is granted an effective date of October 14, 2005 for the grant of service connection for right hip strain and left hip strain.,An earlier effective date prior to April 13, 2011 for the grants of service connection for right hip strain and left hip strain is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded the case due to outstanding SSA and VA records that may be relevant to the claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.