Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
10,989 vetted Board decisions in 2022.
The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for spinal damage and right leg nerve damage, finding that the additional disability did not result from VA's carelessness, negligence, or similar instance of fault.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the severity of the Veteran's service-connected endometriosis, specifically whether absorbent material is required for incontinence.
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to their death. The Board does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this case as they are no longer alive.
The Board denied a compensable disability rating for the Veteran's right little finger disability, finding that her symptoms did not warrant such a rating based on the clinical evidence provided by VA examiners.
The Board denied service connection for mitral valve replacement, finding that the condition did not have its onset in service and has not been chronic or continuous since service separation. The Board also found no evidence of a causal relationship between the Veteran's PTSD and his heart disability.
The Veteran's stomach disorder, including a peptic ulcer, is not related to his service-connected diabetes or hypertension. The left eye retinal detachment and enlarged prostate are also not found to be secondary to his service-connected conditions.,The Veteran's penile lesions are not due to in-service water contamination at Camp Lejeune. His erectile dysfunction is currently rated as zero percent disabling.
The Board has remanded the case due to additional development needed, including obtaining medical records and procuring a new VA examination.
The Board has remanded the case due to failure to substantially comply with prior remand instructions, specifically regarding an addendum opinion on whether the Veteran's ptosis is aggravated by his service-connected eye conditions.
The Veteran's liver cancer is being reviewed for potential service connection due to toxic exposure at Camp Lejeune. The appeal also includes a request for DIC benefits for the Veteran's surviving spouse, which is remanded as well.
The Veteran's claim for a TDIU, including on an extraschedular basis, is being remanded due to the inability to verify his employment history during the appeal period. The case needs further development to obtain the Veteran's tax records and ensure accurate information about his earnings.
The Board has remanded the cases for additional development, including obtaining an addendum opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's lichen simplex of the right lower extremity.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence to determine if the Veteran's chronic rib pain is related to her military service. A VA examination will be scheduled to assess this claim.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for a VA examination to assess the current severity of his service-connected bilateral lower extremity varicose veins due to missing the previously scheduled examination.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's skin condition, specifically whether it is related to service exposure in the Gulf War.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient efforts in obtaining post-service medical records and an inadequate VA examination. The AOJ is instructed to obtain copies of Dr. Koso's treatment records, make reasonable efforts to obtain them, and request a more detailed opinion on the nature and etiology of all current eye disabilities.
The Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation based on the need for regular aid and attendance is being remanded due to incomplete records, including missing mental health treatment records from Kaiser Permanente. The Veteran needs an examination by a clinician to determine if she requires aid and attendance of another person.
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and opinion regarding the Veteran's right hip disorder, left hip disorder, and bilateral heel disorder.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's skin conditions, including actinic keratosis, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma, are not related to his military service or exposure to herbicide agents. The evidence does not support a finding of direct service connection.
The Board has granted a waiver of recovery for an overpayment due to the retroactive removal of the Veteran's spouse as a dependent, finding that it would be against equity and good conscience to recover the debt.
The Veteran's service-connected unspecified adjustment disorder is currently rated at 30 percent effective June 11, 2022. The Board has remanded the case for further development.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.