Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
10,989 vetted Board decisions in 2022.
The Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC benefits is being remanded due to a procedural error in the initial decision, as the criteria used were not consistent with current regulations.
The Veteran's claim for a TDIU prior to April 9, 2020 is being remanded due to the RO's decision finding it moot based on his receipt of a combined 100 percent schedular rating. The issue will be adjudicated on the merits.
The Veteran's appeal for special monthly compensation due to the loss of use of both lower extremities has been dismissed because he died during the pendency of his appeal.
The Veteran's right calcaneal bone spur, Haglund's deformity, and Achilles tendonitis are being remanded for further evaluation as the current evidence is insufficient to determine whether these conditions can be combined or assigned separate disability ratings.
The Board has determined that the previous PCAFC eligibility determination was incorrect due to an improper legal standard and requires further review under the correct criteria.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a lack of a VA examination, and the Veteran's claim for service connection is related to aggravation. The examiner must assess whether the current condition is at least as likely as not caused by or related to service.
The Board has determined that the original decision denying eligibility for PCAFC benefits was based on incorrect criteria and requires remand to evaluate under the correct statutory criteria. Additionally, there is a failure to provide adequate notice of the denial as required by law.
The Board has determined that the overpayment of $6,993.81 due to removal of a dependent spouse from the Veteran's award is valid and not affected by the grant of a waiver request.
The Veteran withdrew all of his appeals, including the one currently under review.
The Board dismissed the appeals as the appellant withdrew all issues in the appeal.
The Veteran's claim for payment of beneficiary travel benefits associated with a special mode of transportation to St. Joseph's Hospital on January 7, 2021 is being remanded due to incomplete information regarding income and medical expenses.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal due to satisfaction with his rating and VA benefits, leading the Board to dismiss the case.
The Veteran's application for PCAFC benefits was dismissed as the appeal is not about service connection, and the Veteran died before eligibility could be established.
Your claim for automobile or other conveyance and adaptive equipment has been dismissed because the Veteran died during its processing.
The Veteran's appeal for TDIU was withdrawn before the Board could make a decision. The case is dismissed.
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to their death. The Board does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this case.
Your appeal for payment or reimbursement of medical services provided by Metro Paramedic Services on August 14, 2020 has been dismissed as your claim was granted administratively.
The Veteran's appeal for TDIU was dismissed due to the death of the appellant.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a urethra disability and a prostate disability, finding that there is no current evidence of these conditions related to his military service.
The Veteran's application for the PCAFC program was denied due to a lack of personal care services and supervision. The Board has decided that the denial decision is not based on valid legal criteria, and therefore, the case must be remanded.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.