Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
10,989 vetted Board decisions in 2022.
The Veteran's decreased visual acuity in the left eye is being remanded for a VA medical opinion to determine if it was caused by carelessness, negligence, or fault on VA's part.
The Veteran's cellulitis of the scalp was rated at a higher 60 percent from May 18, 2009 to November 2, 2011. After that period, he received a 10 percent rating.
The Board has decided that the Veteran's back strain is secondary to his service-connected left foot injury and remanded for further examination and opinion.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for gall bladder removal and pancreas condition due to radiation exposure as the VA examinations are inadequate, and proper procedures under 38 C.F.R. § 3.311 have not been followed.
The Veteran's service from November 18, 2009 through October 21, 2010 and from November 26, 2011 to November 21, 2013 is considered creditable active duty for purposes of Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits. The Veteran's service during these periods qualifies him for the maximum benefit rate of 90 percent.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to incomplete records and need for further review of the validity of the overpayment debt. The Veteran's claim will be reconsidered after obtaining additional information.
The Board dismissed the appeal because the appellant requested to withdraw it before a decision was made.
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his right foot disability has been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating than the current 30 percent assigned since October 4, 2021.
The Veteran's breast cancer is related to his military service, specifically his time stationed at Camp Lejeune where he was exposed to contaminated water. The Board granted the claim based on new evidence and a favorable finding of causation.
The Veteran withdrew his claim for service connection for lower and upper back problems, leading to its dismissal.
The VA denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a brain injury, concluding that there is no evidence to support the claim and finding that the Veteran did not suffer from a TBI.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's ischemic colitis was aggravated by his service-connected hypertension.
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for right ankle ligament strain, right knee degenerative arthritis, and left knee retropatellar pain syndrome with degenerative arthritis were denied as the evidence did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under VA regulations.
The Board found that the overpayment of additional VA compensation benefits was properly created and denied the Veteran's request for an earlier effective date for his spouse, E.
The Veteran's claim for additional education program 'kicker' payments under Chapter 33, Title 38, United States Code is denied as he was no longer eligible for the kicker benefits provided in relation to his Chapter 30 benefits.
The Board denied service connection for residuals of a pituitary tumor, finding that the evidence did not support a finding of an in-service disease or injury indicative of a pituitary tumor and that the disability was not related to service.
The Veteran requested to withdraw the appeal, and as a result, the Board dismissed the case.
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to their death, and no jurisdiction remains for the Board to consider the merits of the case.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a nervous condition was denied in May 1964 due to the absence of evidence showing a disability during or related to his military service.
The Veteran's claims for separate noncompensable disability ratings for left and right leg shin splints are granted as of February 7, 2021.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.