Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
10,167 vetted Board decisions in 2023.
The Veteran's increased disability ratings for left and right hand tremors are being remanded due to inadequate reasons and bases, and the need for updated VA treatment records and a contemporaneous examination.
The Veteran is found to be in need of personal care services due to physical impairments and cognitive impairment, but the VA Caregiver Support Program (CSP) PCAFC Centralized Eligibility and Appeals Team (CEAT) determined he does not meet eligibility criteria. The Board has decided to remand for a determination on whether participation in the PCAFC program is in his best interest.
The Veteran's appeal for a rating of total disability due to individual unemployability based upon service-connected disorders (TDIU) has been dismissed as the appellant requested withdrawal.
The Veteran's request for a waiver of the overpayment of VA benefits in the amount of $1,254.20 was timely filed and the appeal is remanded to adjudicate the issue again.
The Board has determined that new evidence was submitted and the claim is being remanded for further evaluation, including review of dental STRs and an addendum opinion to address service connection for dental problems.
The Veteran's appeal regarding the overpayment of Chapter 33 educational assistance benefits was dismissed as he withdrew his appeal, stating that the debt had been determined to be due to administrative error and no longer needed repayment.
The appeal for benefits under the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is dismissed due to the Veteran's death.
The Veteran requested to withdraw his appeal for benefits under the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC). The Board dismissed this issue as per the Veteran's request.
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed as moot because the requested payment of VA educational assistance benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 3320 was ultimately approved.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to incomplete military personnel records and a duty to assist error. The Veteran's discharge from service is being reviewed for its impact on VA benefits eligibility.
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's appeals for service connection due to lack of specificity in his appeal and because the benefits sought have already been granted.
The appellant has withdrawn their appeal regarding the initial compensable rating for an ingrown toenail, right foot, big toe. The Board dismissed the appeal as a result.
The Board has decided that the Veteran's application for benefits under the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is remanded due to a pre-decisional error. The AOJ needs to reconstruct the claims file and obtain the July 2021 denial notification.
The appeal for PCAFC benefits is dismissed as the Veteran died before eligibility could be established.
The appellant has withdrawn his appeal regarding the initial compensable rating for inguinal hernia postoperative residuals. The Board dismissed the appeal as a result.
The Board has determined that the Veteran is competent to handle disbursement of VA funds and dismissed the appeal.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to incomplete evidence and need for a VA examination.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for deviated nasal septum and broken nose, finding that there is no evidence to support a correlation between his current condition and an in-service injury or event.
The Board has decided that the notification letters regarding eligibility for PCAFC benefits were legally inadequate and there was a pre-decisional duty to assist error. The case is being remanded for an adequate medical decision.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for bilateral lower extremity deep vein thrombosis and superficial vein thrombosis due to insufficient evidence regarding the etiology of his conditions. The Veteran is presumed exposed to toxins during service in the Gulf War, but further examination or opinion is needed to determine if his symptoms are related to service.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.