Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
10,167 vetted Board decisions in 2023.
The Veteran withdrew his appeals for earlier effective dates for adding his children as dependents to his VA disability compensation award. The Board dismissed the appeal.
The Board has remanded the case due to a need for additional development, including obtaining an adequate VA examination to address all of the Veteran's diagnoses and claims.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's need for personal care services and the VA clinical documentation of relevant private primary care treatment.
The Veteran's attorney requested to withdraw the appeal before a decision was made, so the appeal is dismissed.
The Board has decided that the Veteran's cardiovascular disease is related to his active service, including environmental exposures during service in Southwest Asia. However, due to a duty-to-assist error and new evidence submitted by the Veteran, the case is being remanded for further evaluation.
The Veteran's appeal regarding their ability to handle VA funds has been dismissed due to the death of the appellant.
The Veteran's application for PCAFC benefits was denied due to lack of personal care services. The Board has ordered remand to provide a legally adequate medical decision and compliant notice.
The Board has determined that a pre-decisional duty to assist error occurred when the Veteran was not afforded a VA examination, and therefore, remand is necessary for further evaluation.
The Veteran's appeal to remove his former spouse from his dependency award was dismissed because the February 2020 letter proposing removal was not an appealable decision.
The Veteran's discharge was upgraded from 'Under Other than Honorable Conditions' to 'Honorable', which allowed him to be eligible for educational assistance under the Montgomery GI Bill. The Board found that the delimiting date should start on June 13, 2019, when his discharge was modified, and granted his claim.
The appeal is dismissed as there are no specific issues or determinations with which the appellant disagrees. The Veteran's eligibility for DIC and DEA benefits has been granted in full.
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to missing relevant documents and unclear adjudication under the applicable regulations.
The Veteran is granted a 10 percent rating for stress fractures of both lower extremities, effective from the date of the decision.,The Veteran is granted a 10 percent rating for photophobia, effective from November 6, 2002.
The Board has granted service connection for TMJ associated with bruxism, but denied service connection for loss of teeth and periodontal disease due to the absence of a current dental disability for VA compensation purposes.
The Board has granted the appellant's claim for service connection for essential tremor, finding that it is related to his active-duty military service and specifically due to lead exposure from handling cables as part of his MOS.
The Board has remanded the case due to a discrepancy in the payment of ambulance transportation costs. The claim was initially denied, but later paid by VA under another section of law and regulation. The decision is pending clarification on whether the payment has been finalized or if recoupment efforts are ongoing.
The Board dismissed the DIC appeal because the Appellant was not married to the Veteran for one year or more prior to his death, and she did not otherwise meet the criteria for eligibility under VA regulations.
The Veteran's dishonorable discharge bars him from eligibility for VA educational assistance benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill.
The Board has decided to remand the eligibility for benefits under the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) due to pre-decisional errors in the medical opinion and insufficient notice. The claim will be evaluated based on the correct statutory criteria for 'need for supervision, protection or instruction' and proper notification will be provided.
The appeal is dismissed as the Veteran died, making him ineligible for PCAFC benefits.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.