Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's gout is secondary to his service-connected hypertension.
The Board found that the termination of the Veteran's pension benefits was proper due to insufficient information provided regarding income and medical expenses, leading to a denial of the appeal.
The appeal for accrued benefits is dismissed as the appellant has withdrawn their appeal.
The Board has determined that the Appellant's character of discharge was changed from bad conduct to general under honorable conditions, which removes a bar to VA benefits. The appeal is granted.
The Veteran is seeking an earlier effective date for the grant of a total disability based upon individual unemployability (TDIU) from November 1, 2010. The Board finds that there are outstanding records related to his retirement payments and federal employee injury compensation that need to be obtained before making a decision.
The Board denied a compensable rating for the Veteran's bilateral hand skin disability, finding that the evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation under Diagnostic Code 7824.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to errors in fulfilling the duty to assist and unclear reasons for denying the Veteran's claim. The RO must obtain a copy of the STEM Scholarship Degree Program List, contact MCPHS University directly, and clarify whether the Veteran's physician assistant program is equivalent or falls under any of the programs listed on the list.
The Board has determined that the eligibility determination for the VA Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is legally inadequate and requires further review based on a more detailed medical opinion.
The Veteran's daughter, the appellant, was awarded $300.00 in nonservice-connected burial benefits following her father's death. The Board denied additional burial benefits as the maximum amount is established by law at $300.00.
The Board dismissed the appeals as the AOJ administratively approved the appellant's claims for payment of non-VA medical services provided to the Veteran from October 16, 2020 through October 26, 2020.
The appeal regarding an earlier effective date for TDIU is dismissed as the Board's decision is final and unappealable.
The Veteran's service-connected left side clawfoot is rated at 20 percent, the minimum rating under Diagnostic Code 5278. The current symptoms do not warrant a higher rating as they are described as slight to moderate.
The Veteran's claim for a clothing allowance due to topical pain medication for his service-connected bilateral shin splints was denied because the medication does not cause damage to his outer garments.
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for pilonidal cyst has been dismissed as he withdrew his claim through his authorized representative.
The Board has determined that there was a duty to assist error in the prior decision and has ordered a new VA examination for the Veteran's current pancreas disability, including residuals of both the pancreatectomy and splenectomy.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for left and right lower extremity restless leg syndrome due to insufficient medical opinion regarding whether these conditions are secondary to his service-connected panic disorder, generalized anxiety, major depressive disorder, lumbosacral spine disability, bilateral lower extremity sciatic and femoral nerve radiculopathy, knee disabilities, or medications used to treat these conditions.
The April 3, 1973 rating decision denied service connection for a nervous condition. The September 1973 SOC summarizing the prior decisions is not subject to revision based on clear and unmistakable error (CUE).
The appeal for payment or reimbursement of medical services provided by MGH from March 2, 2020 to March 17, 2020 is dismissed because the original denial was overturned and the full amount sought has been approved and paid.
The Board has remanded the claim of service connection for syncope due to inadequate medical opinion and a duty-to-assist error.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.