Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Veteran withdrew her appeals for the 100% rating for astrocytoma, SMC reinstatement, and DEA eligibility effective August 1, 2021.
Your claims for specially adapted housing and special home adaptation have been dismissed due to the Veteran's death. The Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate these claims as they are not related to your service.
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of neurogenic bladder is granted, effective July 16, 2020.,The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his neurogenic bladder condition is denied. The current rating of 60 percent is maintained.
The Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for the evaluations of his gastric ulcer and left elbow disability (supination and pronation) have been dismissed.,The Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for the evaluations of his right elbow disabilities (flexion, supination and pronation) have been denied.
The Board found that the appellant's character of discharge from service constitutes a bar to VA benefits due to willful and persistent misconduct, which is not subject to exceptions.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient explanation of how overpayment amounts were calculated and no evidence provided for housing allowance payments. The Veteran is requested to provide additional information regarding his reasons for withdrawal from the fall 2020 semester, as well as any medical evidence pertaining to his Covid-19 diagnosis.
The appeal is denied as the non-VA medical services provided on February 1, 2021 were not authorized by VA and thus no legal basis for payment exists.
The appeal is denied as the non-VA medical services provided on January 18, 2021 were not authorized by VA and thus no legal basis for payment exists.
The Veteran's right thumb disability is currently rated at 20 percent, but the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted as his condition does not meet or approximate the criteria for a rating in excess of 20 percent.
The Veteran's request to recognize E.L.V. as his adopted child for VA benefits was denied because there is no evidence showing that E.L.V. meets the definition of a 'child' for VA purposes.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for nonservice-connected survivor's (death) pension benefits because her income exceeded the applicable maximum annual pension rates.
The Veteran's service-connected exploratory abdominal surgery is being remanded for a new VA examination to determine the current severity of his condition.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate examination for housebound status or permanent need for regular aid and attendance, requiring a new examination.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's back injury is related to service. The VA needs to provide an addendum opinion addressing the Veteran's in-service low back pain and strain.
The Veteran's claim for an increased evaluation in excess of 10 percent for her service-connected post-concussion syndrome is being remanded due to a duty to assist error. The Board will consider the same record as the RO, but any evidence not considered by the AOJ will be considered during the adjudication of this claim.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to an inadequate VA examination and requests for a new one.
The Veteran withdrew her appeal, so the case is dismissed.
The Board dismissed the appeal as the claim for payment of non-VA medical services provided on December 21, 2020 was resolved in full by administrative action.
The Board has decided that the Veteran does not meet the eligibility criteria for PCAFC benefits due to a denial by the Centralized Eligibility and Appeals Team (CEAT). The decision is being remanded because of errors in notification and medical opinion.
The Board has dismissed the appeal of the issue regarding accrued benefits because no decision on this matter had been issued by the AOJ at the time of the appellant's August 2024 VA Form 10182.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.