Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Board has granted the appellant's request to be a substitute party for his mother's pending accrued benefits claim, as he bore the expense of last sickness and burial.
The Board has dismissed the appeal as the claim for a temporary total evaluation for hospitalization treatment in excess of 21 days for a service-connected condition was granted by the AOJ.
The Board has determined that the Veteran is competent to handle the disbursement of VA funds and has restored his competency.
The Veteran's daughter is seeking to be reimbursed for DEA benefits she received from April 2020 to March 2022. The Board has ordered the RO to obtain her educational file and consolidate it with the decision being appealed.
The Board has granted service connection for colon cancer and dumping syndrome, finding that the Veteran's conditions are at least as likely as not related to his exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune during military service.
The Board has determined that the October 2023 decision denying eligibility for PCAFC benefits is legally inadequate and requires a new medical determination considering all medical information of record.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a lack of a medical opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's parotid gland tumor, which may be related to in-service herbicide exposure. The claim will be returned for further action.
The Board has determined that the October 2023 decision denying eligibility for PCAFC benefits is legally inadequate and requires a new medical determination considering all medical information of record.
The appeal was dismissed because the VA approved the cost of non-VA medical services provided on January 4, 2020.
The Veteran's right hand sprain is granted as service-connected.,Service connection for constipation is denied.,The Board finds the evidence insufficient to establish a link between the Veteran's right elbow disability and service, requiring further examination.,The Board finds the evidence insufficient to establish a link between the Veteran's trigeminal neuralgia and service, but also requires further examination.
The Board dismissed the issue of whether new and relevant evidence was received to readjudicate the claim for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 because the September 2023 rating decision did not become final before the Appellant filed a Supplemental Claim in October 2023.
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant requested to withdraw their appeal prior to a decision being made.
The Board has determined that the October 2023 decision denying eligibility for PCAFC benefits is legally inadequate and requires a new medical determination considering all medical information of record.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient notice and evidence, requiring the AOJ to review the payment process for non-VA medical services provided by the appellant from September 1, 2018, to September 7, 2018.
The Veteran's MRSA did not result from carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault on the part of VA. The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for MRSA.
The Board has granted the appellant's request to be a substitute party for his mother's pending accrued benefits claim, as he bore the expense of last sickness and burial.
The Board has determined that the October 2023 decision denying eligibility for PCAFC benefits is legally inadequate and requires a new medical determination considering all medical information of record.
The Board has determined that the October 2023 decision denying eligibility for PCAFC benefits is legally inadequate and requires a new medical determination considering all medical information of record.
The Veteran's TDIU claim for the period since April 5, 2023 is dismissed due to a total disability rating. The neurocognitive disorder claim and TDIU claim before April 5, 2023 are remanded.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate opinion regarding service connection for a right foot condition. A new examination and opinion are required.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.