Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for a new VA examination to assess the severity of his service-connected bilateral knee disabilities, including patellofemoral syndrome and arthritis. The matter of individual unemployability (TDIU) is also remanded due to its inextricably intertwined nature with the bilateral knee issues.
The Veteran's appeal regarding H.J.B.'s eligibility to an award of attorney fees based on past-due benefits granted in a February 2021 rating decision is dismissed.
The Veteran's former fiduciary, W.C., misappropriated VA benefits and refused to provide proper accountings. The Board found that the criteria for a misuse determination were not met.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for a bilateral foot condition, higher evaluations for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine, and an earlier effective date for an increased evaluation of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine due to procedural errors and incomplete examinations.
The Board has remanded the case due to a duty-to-assist error, requiring another VA examination to determine if the Veteran's pulmonary nodule is related to his military service.
The Veteran's stroke residuals are now rated at a compensable level of 10 percent, effective August 10, 2022. The earlier effective date for service connection for the stroke residuals is also granted.
The Veteran's service was not characterized as honorable and he did not meet the eligibility requirements for Chapter 30 educational assistance benefits.
The Board is remanding the claim because there was an error in satisfying a regulatory and statutory duty, which has a reasonable possibility of aiding in substantiating the appellant's claim. The notice provided did not meet the criteria outlined in 38 U.S.C. § 5104.
The appeal for eligibility to the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is dismissed due to the Veteran's death.
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for myelodysplastic syndrome was dismissed because the AOJ found clear and unmistakable error in the June 2021 rating decision, leading to a grant of service connection on November 26, 2019.
The Veteran's prescription medication for an occlusive thrombosis was approved for reimbursement as part of the non-VA emergency treatment on February 14, 2024. The appeal is granted.
The Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on loss of use of his hands and feet has been denied as he still retains effective function in these limbs, despite having difficulty with grasping and manipulation.
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date to recognize his child A.P-W. for VA compensation purposes was denied as the earliest possible effective date is September 1, 2020.
The Board has determined that the July 2021 decision denying survivor's pension, DIC, and accrued benefits was not fully considered on its merits due to procedural errors in notifying the appellant of her rights and providing sufficient evidence. The claims are being remanded for further development.
The appeal for TDIU and DEA eligibility, which were discontinued effective July 1, 2020, has been dismissed due to the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty-to-assist error and requires a new medical opinion from the CEAT.
The Board dismissed the appeal due to procedural defects and lack of an identified appealable decision.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to an inadequate medical opinion regarding the Veteran's Crohn's disease. The claim will be returned for further review.
The Veteran's Hemoglobin D-A disorder is currently rated as noncompensable under the applicable rating criteria. The Board has determined that a new VA examination is needed to determine the current level of severity of all impairment resulting from her Hemoglobin D-A disorder.
The Veteran requested to withdraw their appeal for a rating greater than 10 percent for right hip strain, and the Board has dismissed this issue.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.