Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Board has determined that the Veteran was entitled to monthly housing allowance under Chapter 33 for periods of active duty service in December 2017, September 2018 (September 7), and September 2018 (September 14). The appeal is granted as there was no overpayment due to VA's administrative error.
The Veteran's death was caused by a motor vehicle accident during active duty service, and the Board found that it occurred in the line of duty. Service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death is granted.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a stomach disability was granted, and he is now eligible to receive past-due benefits. The attorney's eligibility to fees based on these benefits is contested.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's causes of death are related to his military service, particularly his conceded exposure to herbicide agents in Vietnam. The VA is required to obtain a retrospective medical opinion from a VA examiner to determine if any of the Veteran's causes of death were incurred or related to active service.
The appeal is dismissed because the Veteran received care through a Veterans Community Care Program and the billing process for these services is governed by statutory and contractual authority that does not allow for review by the Board.
The Board has dismissed the appeal for plot or interment allowance benefits as it was not properly filed and does not allege specific error of fact or law in the May 2021 agency decision.
The Veteran's six years of reserve service are confirmed, granting him eligibility for VA home loan guaranty benefits.
The appeal seeking payment or reimbursement for the cost of medical services performed on March 12, 2020 by the Appellant is dismissed as the claim has been approved and no case or controversy remains.
The Veteran's appeal for earlier effective dates for adding her children as dependents to her VA disability compensation award was denied. The Board found that the Veteran did not submit necessary dependency information within one year of receiving notification of her combined 30 percent disability rating, which resulted in retroactive benefits.
The Veteran's appeal to have his incarcerated status considered in the apportionment of his VA disability compensation benefits was dismissed because he did not have standing to contest the decision.
The Board has decided to remand the matter due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error, specifically regarding the validity of the overpayment created in October 2019. The Veteran's challenge to the debt's creation is pending and must be addressed by the AOJ before any further action can be taken.
The Veteran did not have any service-connected disabilities, and the claim for payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical care rendered on March 3, 2020 was denied as it was received more than 90 days after discharge from the facility.
The Board denied service connection for benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) due to exposure to herbicide agents, finding that the Veteran's BPH is not related to his service or herbicide exposure.
The Board has dismissed the appeal as there is no administrative review process for disputes related to contractual payment rates under Veterans Care Agreements (VCAs).
The Veteran's request for a waiver of recovery of the overpayment of compensation benefits in the amount of $167,572 is considered timely. The Board has remanded this matter to the Committee on Waivers and Compromises for further adjudication.
The Veteran's myelodysplastic syndrome is granted as service connected due to exposure to herbicide agents in Vietnam, with the Board resolving all reasonable doubt in favor of the claim.
The Board has granted service connection for nocturia/voiding dysfunction, finding that it is aggravated by the Veteran's service-connected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not meet the eligibility criteria for PCAFC benefits due to a lack of personal care services and clinical best interest. The decision is being remanded for further review.
The Board has dismissed the appeals for payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical expenses incurred by Signature Care Home Care on May 4, 2019, May 11, 2019, and May 30, 2019. The VA has already authorized payment of these expenses.
Your appeal has been dismissed because the form you submitted is a duplicate of an earlier submission that was already decided.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.