Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for retinal detachment of the left eye and right eye, finding that there was no evidence to support a claim of carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, or error in judgment by VA personnel.
The appeal for the Veteran's cause of death is dismissed as the appellant has died, and the Board does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate this claim.
The appeal was dismissed because the VA Office of Community Care administratively approved the Appellant's claim for payment of non-VA emergency medical services provided to the Veteran on January 16, 2020.
The Board denied the veteran's claims of service connection for mental health disorders and neurobehavioral problems, finding that there was no evidence linking these conditions to his military service or any exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune. The veteran's current diagnoses were not shown to be related to events in service.
The Board found the Veteran's waiver request timely filed. The appeal is remanded to adjudicate the validity of the overpayment debt and consider whether it was validly created.
The appeal has been dismissed as the claim for payment of non-VA emergency medical services provided on November 15, 2019, was administratively approved by VA.
The Veteran's claim for a waiver of the recoupment of an overpayment debt in the amount of $50,880 is granted due to the Board finding that it would be against principles of equity and good conscience to recoup this debt.
The Board denied the appeal as to reinstatement of DIC benefits prior to July 18, 2019, finding that an earlier effective date was not warranted due to the documentation being received more than a year after the Appellant's release from incarceration.
The Board has dismissed the appeal as there is no longer a case or controversy for decision due to VHA overturning its initial denial and approving the non-VA medical care provided by ASC on December 17, 2020.
The appeal for payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical services provided on August 8, 2020 is dismissed as the episode of care was improperly filed to VA.
The Veteran's appeal is dismissed due to their death during the pendency of the appeal.
The Board has restored the previously assigned disability ratings for trochanteric pain syndrome and iliopsoas tendinitis of the right hip with limitation of flexion and thigh impairment from 20 percent to 20 percent, as the reductions were not based on improvement in the Veteran's ability to function under ordinary conditions.
The Veteran's claims for payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical services provided on September 11, 2019 are being remanded due to incomplete notice and the need to consider all applicable means of payment under 38 U.S.C. �� 1725 and 1728.
The Board has denied increased ratings for the Veteran's service-connected scars of both knees and has remanded the claims for an evaluation higher than 10 percent for a disability of the thoracic spine, as well as service connection for shooting pain in the left leg.
The Board has granted a waiver of recovery for the Veteran's overpayment due to receipt of drill pay for fiscal years FYs 2016, 2017, and 2018. The decision is based on the Veteran's financial hardship and inability to repay the debt without causing undue financial strain.
The Board has determined that the overpayment of VA educational benefits was due to an administrative error and has been resolved. As a result, there is no longer a debt owing, and the appeal is dismissed as moot.
The Board dismissed the appeal because the AOJ did not make a decision on the claim and the notice letter from VA indicated that the claim could not be processed due to lack of an authorization number.
The Board has granted service connection for hysterectomy and denied service connection for anemia. The Veteran's hysterectomy is found to be related to her in-service symptoms, while the evidence does not support a link between her current anemia and service.
The Veteran's child, L.W., is eligible for CHAMPVA medical benefits. The appellant seeks preauthorization coverage for an external defibrillator (AED) for L.W. due to her diagnosis of Brugada syndrome. However, the VHA denied the claim as the AED was not considered a covered benefit under CHAMPVA policy.
The Board has determined that the appellant's discharge from active duty service is due to a character issue and thus bars him from receiving VA benefits. The case is being remanded for further action regarding an application for upgrade of his discharge.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.