Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Veteran seeks reimbursement for beneficiary travel benefits incurred on February 28, 2023. The claim is being remanded as the income information required to determine eligibility has not been provided.
The Board has dismissed the appeal because the appellant requested to withdraw their claim for benefits under VA's PCAFC program.
The Veteran's son, F.M., was granted dependency benefits effective July 7, 2021, based on his permanent incapacity for self-support. The effective date is not earlier than this as the evidence of dependency arose after the claim was filed.
The Board has decided to remand the cases for further development due to a lack of VA examinations and consideration of toxic exposure risk activity (TERA). The Veteran's service in Vietnam is presumed, but cancer diagnoses are not presumptively associated with herbicide agent exposure.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the character of his discharge, and the Board dismissed the case as a result.
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete opinions and the need for a VA examination related to service connection for Crohn's disease, including consideration of in-service exposure to toxins.
The Veteran's surviving spouse is granted additional DIC benefits for her dependent minor child F. from October 1, 2003 to August 16, 2005.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a failure to consider secondary service connection or separate ratings for left eye pain, discharge, muscle spasms, and dry eye syndrome. The AOJ will need to provide an examination to determine if these symptoms are related to the Veteran's service-connected left eye choroidal rupture.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including his status-post posterior fossa epidermoid mass with residual dysmetria and ataxia of the left upper extremity, and dysmetria and ataxia of the left lower extremity, result in loss of use of one lower extremity together with the loss or loss of use of one upper extremity which so affect the functions of balance or propulsion as to preclude locomotion without the aid of braces, crutches, canes, or a wheelchair. As such, he is eligible for specially adapted housing and his claim for special home adaptation grant is dismissed.
Your appeal has been dismissed because the VA authorized and paid for your medical expenses on its own initiative.
The Veteran's restrictive lung disease is granted as service connected due to exposure to burn pits during his Southwest Asia theater of operations service, with the effective date being August 10, 2022.
The Board dismissed the appeal as to the claim of entitlement to an effective date earlier than May 26, 2021 for the award of a total disability rating based upon individual unemployability (TDIU) because it is final and binding.
The Veteran's initial eligibility for benefits under the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) has been established, and no further appeal is needed as this constitutes a full grant of the benefit sought.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current respiratory disability is causally related to his in-service asbestos exposure, and thus service connection for a respiratory disability is granted.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a waiver of recovery of an overpayment of VA compensation benefits, finding that the Veteran was primarily at fault for the creation of the debt and that recovery would not violate principles of equity and good conscience.
The Veteran's appeal for an earlier effective date for the increased rating of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome with cataracts is dismissed due to a procedural defect.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for right eye loss of sight, finding that new and relevant evidence did not support readjudication.
The Veteran's income exceeds the maximum annual pension rate for a veteran with no dependents, specifically those in need of regular aid and attendance. Therefore, he is denied nonservice-connected pension benefits.
The Board has granted service connection for Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) as it is related to a cold injury sustained during active duty. The decision resolves the doubt in favor of the Veteran.
Your appeal for a higher rating for painful scar, residual of hydrocelectomy (claimed as chronic pain) has been dismissed because the Board denied this issue in October 2023 and your request to review that decision is not allowed.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.