Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Board has decided to remand the issue of whether the overpayment debt was properly created due to errors in the AOJ's decision and the appellant's statements regarding her income.
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for her service-connected menstrual blood loss/iron deficiency anemia is remanded due to duty to assist errors prior to the February 2020 HLR rating decision on appeal. The Board finds that a new VA examination and efforts to obtain private treatment records are required.
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant requested to withdraw his appeal.
The Veteran's claim for PCAFC benefits was denied due to not meeting eligibility criteria. The decision is remanded as the AOJ must provide proper notice and consider the case under the appropriate eligibility criteria.
The appeal of the denial of agent fees has been withdrawn by the appellant.
The Board has determined that the cause of death listed on the Veteran's death certificate is not sufficient to determine if a service-connected disability caused, contributed to, or aggravated the death. The Board therefore remands the case for further action.
The Veteran's nonservice-connected pension benefits claim was denied because he did not have active military service during a period of war, making him ineligible for the benefit.
The Board has decided to remand the claim for service connection of a neck condition due to unclear medical opinions and insufficient evidence.
The appeal for non-VA ambulance services provided on March 20, 2022, is dismissed as the claim was already approved and paid by VA.
The appeal was dismissed due to the death of the appellant, who was substituted for her deceased husband. The Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this appeal at this time.
The Veteran is seeking payment or reimbursement for non-VA medical expenses incurred on November 20, 2019. The claim was denied because there was no prior authorization and the Veteran did not meet the criteria for payment under VA authorities. The Board has decided to remand the case for further development including obtaining information from the Veteran regarding third-party recourse.
The Veteran's service at the USAFAPS and USAFA did not qualify as active duty for purposes of Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits due to his status as a pre-cadet candidate, which is not considered qualifying 'active duty' service. The Veteran was denied eligibility for educational assistance under this program.
The Board has determined that the initial determination denying PCAFC benefits was not adequate and requires further review, including obtaining medical opinions from CEAT.
The Board has granted service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that his acute myeloblastic leukemia was related to his exposure to herbicide agents during service.
The Board found that the overpayment of $136.00 was properly created due to the retroactive removal of the Veteran's spouse from his VA disability compensation benefits upon her death, and thus denied the appeal.
The Board dismissed the appeal because there is no justiciable case or controversy regarding whether the Veteran is competent to manage VA benefits and thus, requiring a fiduciary.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for other specified trauma and stressor-related disorder and somatic symptom disorder with depressive and anxious features are remanded due to the need for a new VA examination.
The appeal for payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical expenses provided by the appellant on November 23, 2020 is dismissed because VA approved the request after receiving a disagreement from the appellant.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for adjustment disorder with other specified trauma was granted in April 2022, covering the entire period on appeal. As a result, the appeal is dismissed.
The Veteran requested to withdraw his appeal for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU). As a result, the Board dismissed this issue.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.