Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Board has determined that the Veteran meets the criteria for a higher-level stipend (Level 2) under the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC), as he is in need of personal care services due to his inability to self-sustain in the community.
The Board dismissed the appeal as the claim for payment of non-VA COVID-19 testing provided to the Veteran on July 22, 2020 has been approved by VA and payment has already been made.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty-to-assist error and requires additional medical opinion regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's bone cyst.
The Veteran's adult child, K.T., is recognized as the surviving child for purposes of DIC, death pension, and accrued benefits due to becoming permanently incapacitated prior to age 18.
The Board has dismissed the appeal regarding special monthly compensation (SMC) based on aid and attendance/housebound status as the benefit sought has been granted in full.
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date prior to July 6, 2010, for Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA) benefits was denied because he did not meet the schedular requirements for DEA benefits before that date.
The Veteran withdrew her appeal, and the Board dismissed it due to lack of allegations of errors in fact or law.
The Board dismissed the appeal as the claim for payment of non-VA COVID-19 testing provided to the Veteran on October 21, 2020 has been resolved in favor of the Appellant with VA making the payment.
The Veteran's appeal for restoration of a total disability rating due to individual unemployability (TDIU) was dismissed because he elected the supplemental claim option, effectively withdrawing his request for review by the Board.
The Veteran's service-connected other specified trauma and stressor related disorder alone rendered him unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment consistent with his education and work history.
The Board dismissed the appeal of the claim for a total disability rating due to individual unemployability (TDIU) prior to April 29, 2022 as the appellant requested withdrawal of the appeal.
The Veteran's application for PCAFC benefits is denied because the serious injuries were incurred before May 7, 1975 and the application was filed after October 1, 2020.
The Veteran's appeal for educational assistance benefits under Chapter 33 is denied because his service did not meet the eligibility criteria, specifically due to a discharge from active duty for unsatisfactory performance and conduct at entry level.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's Crohn's disease is pronounced, resulting in marked malnutrition, anemia, and general debility, or with serious complication as liver abscess. As a result, the Veteran's claim for a disability rating of 100 percent for Crohn's disease is granted.
The Board has decided that additional development is needed due to the PACT Act, which requires a VA examination and medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's cancer was related to his exposure to toxic chemicals during service. The case is remanded for this purpose.
The Board has granted increased disability ratings of 20 percent for right and left shin splints, but no higher. The Veteran's bilateral shin splints are currently rated under Diagnostic Code 5262.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for VR&E services, and the case is dismissed.
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's neck condition but has remanded her claim for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma due to conflicting dates of active duty and Reserve service.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA) benefits under Chapter 35 beyond October 17, 2012 due to the expiration of the 10-year eligibility period and lack of extension based on medical infeasibility or active service.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate medical opinions regarding the Veteran's hiatal hernia, which may be related to service. The case will need to be reviewed with new medical opinions considering all relevant evidence.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.